July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Usefulness of Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients with Progressive Glaucoma and a History of Laser Refractive Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sang Yeop Lee
    Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Univ. Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Korea (the Democratic People's Republic of)
  • Hyoung Won Bae
    Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Univ. Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Korea (the Democratic People's Republic of)
  • Gong Je Sung
    Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Univ. Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Korea (the Democratic People's Republic of)
  • Chan Y Kim
    Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Univ. Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Sinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Korea (the Democratic People's Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sang Yeop Lee, None; Hyoung Won Bae, None; Gong Je Sung, None; Chan Kim, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 2422. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sang Yeop Lee, Hyoung Won Bae, Gong Je Sung, Chan Y Kim; Usefulness of Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients with Progressive Glaucoma and a History of Laser Refractive Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):2422.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :
To compare the association of IOP parameters measured by DCT and GAT with the progression of glaucoma in eyes with a history of laser refractive surgery (LRS).

Methods : Participants: Patients with open-angle glaucoma and a LRS history who visited the glaucoma clinic at the Department of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine, between January 2005 and June 2017 were identified by review of the medical records. Ninety-eight eyes (54 patients) were included in the study.

Interventions: IOP was measured by both GAT and DCT during follow-up. Two additional equations were used to convert the results obtained by GAT to corrected IOP parameters. Progression of glaucoma was defined by structural and/or functional alterations.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the association between progression of glaucoma and each IOP parameter measured by the different tonometry methods and formulae and whether the DCT parameters were more relevant to progression of glaucoma than the other IOP parameters. Baseline, mean, and peak IOP, fluctuation of IOP, and reduction of IOP were measured by each tonometry method. Clustered logistic regression was used to identify variables correlated with the progression of glaucoma. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for correlated variables were compared using Delong’s method.

Results : Twenty-two eyes showed progression of glaucoma. The mean DCT value (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, P = .024), peak DCT value (OR 1.19, P = .02), and pattern standard deviation (OR 1.10, P = .016) were significant risk factors for progression. There was a significant difference in the predictive ability of the mean DCT and GAT values (AUC 0.63 and 0.514, respectively; P = .01) and of the peak DCT and GAT values (0.646 and 0.503, respectively, P = .009). The AUC values for corrected IOP did not exceed those of DCT.

Conclusions : IOP measurements were more associated with progression of glaucoma when measurements were obtained by DCT than GAT in eyes with an LRS history.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

Areas under the curve for mean and peak IOP obtained by GAT and DCT for prediction of progression of glaucoma. The results for mean IOP are shown on the left and those for peak IOP on the right.

Areas under the curve for mean and peak IOP obtained by GAT and DCT for prediction of progression of glaucoma. The results for mean IOP are shown on the left and those for peak IOP on the right.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×