July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL
yingjie lin; Xianjun Liang; Jingchun Guo; XU CHEN; Zhituo Dong
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • yingjie lin
    Aier School of Ophthalmology,Central South University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
  • Xianjun Liang
    Aier School of Ophthalmology,Central South University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
  • Jingchun Guo
    Aier School of Ophthalmology,Central South University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
  • XU CHEN
    Aier School of Ophthalmology,Central South University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
  • Zhituo Dong
    Aier School of Ophthalmology,Central South University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   yingjie lin, None; Xianjun Liang, None; Jingchun Guo, None; XU CHEN, None; Zhituo Dong, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 4288. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      User Alerts
      You are adding an alert for:
      Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL
      You will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. You can manage this and all other alerts in My Account
      The alert will be sent to:
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation
      Citation

      yingjie lin, Xianjun Liang, Jingchun Guo, XU CHEN, Zhituo Dong; Comparison of clinical performance between trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):4288.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
    • Get Permissions
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the visual acuity and visual quality of trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and extend depth of focus (EDOF) IOL.

Methods : This prospective, comparative clinical study enrolled 50 eyes of 50 patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of a trifocal IOL (Lisa tri839, Carl Zeiss) oran EDOF IOL (TECNIS Symfony; Abbott Medical Optics, Inc.). There are 24 eyes in trifocal group while 26 eyes in EDOF group. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were evaluated one month postoperatively. The other outcomes is quality of vision including total aberration, tilt, high order aberration, coma, trefoil ,sphere and MTF in pupil of 3mm, 4mm and 5mm by using the OPD-Scan III.

Results : Trifocal group shows a signification better intermediate and near visual outcomes(0.041logMAR± 0.088SD, 0.054logMAR± 0.171SD) than EDOF group (0.130logMAR± 0.106SD, 0.148logMAR± 0.104SD, P<0.05). There is no signification difference in UDVA between two groups. The defocus curve confirmed good visual acuity and smooth profile in trifocal group. There were no differences in aberrometry and MTF between two groups.

Conclusions : Trifocal IOLs had an advantage over EDOF IOLs in intermediate and near visual acuity, while both trifocal IOLs and EDOF IOLs showed excellent performance in distance visual acuity and visual quality.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

Figure 1. Postoperative uncorrected distance,intermediate and near visual outcomes of trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL. Figure2. The mean defocus curve of the two IOL samples.
View OriginalDownload Slide

Figure 1. Postoperative uncorrected distance,intermediate and near visual outcomes of trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL. Figure2. The mean defocus curve of the two IOL samples.

Figure 1. Postoperative uncorrected distance,intermediate and near visual outcomes of trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL. Figure2. The mean defocus curve of the two IOL samples.

Figure 1. Postoperative uncorrected distance,intermediate and near visual outcomes of trifocal IOL and EDOF IOL. Figure2. The mean defocus curve of the two IOL samples.
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Table 1.Trifocal group shows a signification better intermediate and near visual outcomes than EDOF group ( P<0.05). There is no signification difference in UDVA between two groups. There were no differences in aberrometry and MTF between two groups.
View OriginalDownload Slide

Table 1.Trifocal group shows a signification better intermediate and near visual outcomes than EDOF group ( P<0.05). There is no signification difference in UDVA between two groups. There were no differences in aberrometry and MTF between two groups.

Table 1.Trifocal group shows a signification better intermediate and near visual outcomes than EDOF group ( P<0.05). There is no signification difference in UDVA between two groups. There were no differences in aberrometry and MTF between two groups.

Table 1.Trifocal group shows a signification better intermediate and near visual outcomes than EDOF group ( P<0.05). There is no signification difference in UDVA between two groups. There were no differences in aberrometry and MTF between two groups.
View OriginalDownload Slide

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
Copyright © 2025 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.Accept