July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome use for laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicolás Kahuam-López
    Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Huixquilican, Mexico
    Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac México, Campus Norte, Mexico City, Huixquilucan, Mexico
  • Alejandro Navas
    Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Huixquilican, Mexico
  • Carlos Castillo-Salgado
    Epidemiology,, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School ofPublic Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Enrique O Graue-Hernandez
    Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Huixquilican, Mexico
  • Aida Jimenez-Corona
    Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Huixquilican, Mexico
  • Antonio Ibarra
    Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anáhuac México, Campus Norte, Mexico City, Huixquilucan, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nicolás Kahuam-López, None; Alejandro Navas, None; Carlos Castillo-Salgado, None; Enrique Graue-Hernandez, None; Aida Jimenez-Corona, None; Antonio Ibarra, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Grant 1 U01 EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes ofHealth, USA.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 5054. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicolás Kahuam-López, Alejandro Navas, Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Antonio Ibarra; Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome use for laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):5054.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The femtosecond laser has some theoretical advantages over the use of a mechanical microkeratome in LASIK, these advantages are controversial in the clinical setting. We performed a systematic review to compare the effectiveness and safety of femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome in LASIK for myopia.

Methods : We included randomized controlled trials comparing femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted LASIK. Study inclusion was not restricted on the basis of language or publication status. The electronic searches were performed by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) Information Specialist using electronic databases for randomized controlled trials. The studies were assessed against pre specified inclusion criteria, evaluated the risk of bias using the "“Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool” and extracted data from the selected studies. We calculated mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous measures and risk ratios (RRs) with the corresponding 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes to estimate treatment effects. The full protocol was registered at the Cochrane Library.

Results : The electronic searches identified 4,409 references, after the selection process, a total of 9 studies, representing 550 eyes, were included in the review. The MDs of the mean uncorrected visual acuity after surgery, best corrected visual acuity after surgery and mean spherical equivalent of refractive error after surgery were 0 (-0.03, 0.02), -0.01 (-0.04, 0.02) and 0.20 (0.13, 0.26) respectively. The RRs of the proportion of eyes within 0.5 diopters of target refraction after surgery (Figure 1) and diffuse lamellar keratitis (Figure 2) were 0.91 (0.83, 1.00) and 0.27 (0.10, 0.78).

Conclusions : The use of femtosecond laser to create the corneal flap in LASIK is related to a higher risk of producing diffuse lamellar keratitis, and there is no significant benefits in visual outcomes compared with the mechanical microkeratome. There are few studies in the literature that focus on patient oriented outcomes and report adverse events, therefore a significant uncertainty in efficacy and accuracy between LASIK with femtosecond laser or mechanical microkeratome exist. Future clinical trials should focus on reporting patient oriented outcomes using a standardized protocol of outcomes and follow-up intervals.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×