July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Comparison of the P.E.R.F.E.C.T. and a modified amniotic membrane graft version of the technique for pterygium removal.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sahitya Podila
    School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Gina Nguyen
    School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Orrin Myers
    Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Linda Rose
    Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sahitya Podila, None; Gina Nguyen, None; Orrin Myers, None; Linda Rose, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 6251. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sahitya Podila, Gina Nguyen, Orrin Myers, Linda Rose; Comparison of the P.E.R.F.E.C.T. and a modified amniotic membrane graft version of the technique for pterygium removal.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):6251.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Studies of the pterygium extended removal followed by extended conjunctival transplant (P.E.R.F.E.C.T.) method of pterygium removal surgery have demonstrated an extremely low recurrence rate. We performed a retrospective, observational clinical study to report the outcomes of this technique, and those of the same surgical technique employing amniotic membrane graft (AMG) instead of a conjunctival autograft.

Methods : We studied eyes of adult patients who underwent primary and recurrent pterygium surgery by a single experienced surgeon from January 2011 to August 2018. During this time both techniques were used. Post-operative follow up evaluations were conducted at one day, one week, one month, four months, and one year to assess recurrence, complications, narcotic prescription, and total amount of steroid drop use. Relative frequencies of categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher exact tests, and non-parametric Wilcoxon tests were used to analyze continuous variables. Duration of steroid use (days) for the two techniques were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests.

Results : The study included 297 eyes with 226 treated by standard P.E.R.F.E.C.T. and 71 treated with the same surgical technique employing AMG. The median length of surgery was 51.0 minutes for the P.E.R.F.E.C.T. technique and 37.0 minutes for the AMG group, and was significantly shorter in the AMG group of patients (P=<.0001). There were 3 conjunctival recurrences with each of the techniques with percentage recurrence not significantly different for the two groups, 4.1% AMG and 1.3% P.E.R.F.E.C.T., P = 0.158. Narcotics were prescribed at 1 day post op to 8 patients (3.5%) in the PERFECT group and 2 patients (2.8%) in the AMG group based on reported pain and clinician discretion. Median duration of steroid use was 54 days (95% CI 37 – 67) for AMG compared to 85 days (95% CI 73 – 92, log-rank test P = 0.002) for the PERFECT group.

Conclusions : Our experience shows that the modified technique using AMG provides a faster alternative with shorter steroid use than the PERFECT technique for pterygium removal.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

Kaplan-Meier curve with estimates for duration of steroid use. Median duration of steroid use was 54 days (95% CI 37 – 67) for AMG compared to 85 days (95% CI 73 – 92, log-rank test P = 0.002) for the PERFECT group.

Kaplan-Meier curve with estimates for duration of steroid use. Median duration of steroid use was 54 days (95% CI 37 – 67) for AMG compared to 85 days (95% CI 73 – 92, log-rank test P = 0.002) for the PERFECT group.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×