July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Asymptomatic versus symptomatic young contact lens wearers: differences in corneal sensitivity, ocular surface temperature, tear stability and blinking rate.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M Carmen Acosta
    Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernandez-CSIC, San Juan, ALICANTE, Spain
  • José Ángel Pastor-Zaplana
    Instituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernandez-CSIC, San Juan, ALICANTE, Spain
  • Juana Gallar
    Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   M Carmen Acosta, None; José Pastor-Zaplana, None; Juana Gallar, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  SAF2017-83674-C2-1-R and -2-R, Agencia Estatal de Investigacion, Spain, and European Regional Development Fund, European Union; PROMETEO/2018/114, Generalitat Valenciana, Spain, and H2020 Program Grant Agreement No. 667400, European Commission.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 6352. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M Carmen Acosta, José Ángel Pastor-Zaplana, Juana Gallar; Asymptomatic versus symptomatic young contact lens wearers: differences in corneal sensitivity, ocular surface temperature, tear stability and blinking rate.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):6352.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We have analyzed corneal sensitivity with a gas esthesiometer, corneal surface temperature, blink frequency, tearing rate and TBUT in young contact lens wearers (CLWs) with and without ocular surface discomfort symptoms, and in eye glasses wearers (EGWs).

Methods : Young subjects (18-40 years old) of both sexes participated voluntarily. CLWs were divided in asymptomatic (CLW-A) and symptomatic (CLW-S) subjects depending on their OSDI score (<13 and ≥13, respectively). Mechanical and chemical corneal sensitivity (explored with the Belmonte-CRCERT gas esthesiometer; 3s-duration gas jets at 0-200 ml/min flow, 0-80% CO2; sensation scored in a 0-10 VAS), corneal surface temperature (CST; explored using an IR video camera), spontaneous and attentional (visual task) blinking frequency, tearing rate (phenol red threads, 15s) and TBUT were measured. EGWs with similar refractive errors that never wore CL served as control.

Results : Irritation VAS values evoked by mechanical and chemical stimulation measured 5 min after CL removal were higher in CLW than in EGW wearers (p<0.05), although no differences between CLW-A and CLW-S were found (see Table). CST was lower in CLW than in EGW, although with higher values in CLW-S group (see table). Both spontaneous and attentional blinking frequency were higher in CLWs, reaching significant differences in CLW-S (see Table). Tearing rate was similar in all three groups, although TBUT was significantly shorter in CLW-S group (see Table).

Conclusions : CL wearing produce in some subjects symptoms of ocular discomfort that could be consecutive to tissue inflammation, tear instability and corneal sensory nerve damage. Altered firing of corneal nerves lead to an increase in spontaneous and stimulus-evoked irritation sensation, and increase blink frequency.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×