July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Characterization of copy number variants (CNVs) identified by genetic testing of inherited retinal disorders
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lucia Guidugli
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Miika Mehine
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Sari Tuupanen
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Kati Kämpjärvi
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Kirsty Wells
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Johanna Känsäkoski
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Miko Valori
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Inka Saarinen
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Mikko Muona
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Eeva-Marja Kaarina Sankila
    Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Finland
  • Samuel Myllykangas
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Juha Koskenvuo
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Tero-Pekka Alastalo
    Blueprint Genetics, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lucia Guidugli, Blueprint Genetics (E); Miika Mehine, Blueprint Genetics (E); Sari Tuupanen, Blueprint Genetics (E); Kati Kämpjärvi, Bleuprint Genetics (E); Kirsty Wells, Blueprint Genetics (E); Johanna Känsäkoski, Blueprint Genetics (E); Miko Valori, Blueprint Genetics (E); Inka Saarinen, Blueprint Genetics (E); Mikko Muona, Blueprint Genetics (E); Eeva-Marja Sankila, Blueprint Genetics (C); Samuel Myllykangas, Blueprint Genetics (E); Juha Koskenvuo, Blueprint Genetics (E); Tero-Pekka Alastalo, Blueprint Genetics (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 2944. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lucia Guidugli, Miika Mehine, Sari Tuupanen, Kati Kämpjärvi, Kirsty Wells, Johanna Känsäkoski, Miko Valori, Inka Saarinen, Mikko Muona, Eeva-Marja Kaarina Sankila, Samuel Myllykangas, Juha Koskenvuo, Tero-Pekka Alastalo; Characterization of copy number variants (CNVs) identified by genetic testing of inherited retinal disorders. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):2944.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Retinal dystrophies (RD) include a heterogeneous group of disorders that damage the photoreceptors in the retina and cause visual impairment. Prompt and comprehensive genetic diagnosis of these disorders can assist in risk assessment measures, management of symptoms, and selection of the appropriate targeted treatment. To provide a comprehensive diagnosis, the genetic testing strategy needs to take into account sequence alterations as well as copy number variants (CNVs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates and characteristics of CNVs in a cohort of 2754 patients tested using a comprehensive RD panel.

Methods : DNA from patients was sequenced by targeted OS-Seq using the Illumina NextSeq500 sequencing platform or the IDT xGEN Exome Research Panel using the Illumina NovaSeq platform.

Results : CNVs in a total of 47 genes matching the patient’s phenotype were reported as a primary finding in 128 out of 2754 (4.6%) cases. Of these, 91 (71.1%) were partial gene deletions, 17 (13.3%) whole gene deletions, four (3.1%) one exon deletions, and one (0.8%) was a partial exon deletion. In addition, ten (7.8%) partial gene duplications, three (2.3%) whole gene duplications, one (0.8%) whole gene gain (CN>3), and one (0.8%) partial gene gain (CN>3) were identified (Figure 1). The majority of CNVs (113, 88.3%) were either likely pathogenic or pathogenic while 15 (11.7%) were variants of uncertain significance. Of the likely pathogenic and pathogenic CNVs, 94 (73.4%) were diagnostic: 66 (70.2%) in autosomal recessive genes, 17 (18.1%) in autosomal dominant genes, and 11 (11.7%) in X-linked genes. The USH2A, EYS and PRPF31 genes were enriched in CNVs compared to other genes. Notably, CNVs were identified also in genes in which CNVs are not commonly reported, e.g. ABCA4 and RPE65.

Conclusions : Overall, these results highlight the importance of a comprehensive genetic testing approach for the diagnosis of retinal dystrophies. We have identified CNVs ranging from one exon deletions to whole gene deletions in multiple genes. In addition, we have detected a relatively high percentage of copy number duplications that warrant further investigation.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×