July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
A Comparison in Precision and Accuracy of the Conventional Syringe to the Suh Precision Syringe
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Devin DeLuna
    College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Audrey Netzel
    School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Jamie Dietze
    College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Brett Andrew Begley
    College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Jideofor Ndulue
    Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Donny Suh
    Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
    Ophthalmology, Childrens Hospital & Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Devin DeLuna, None; Audrey Netzel, None; Jamie Dietze, None; Brett Begley, None; Jideofor Ndulue, None; Donny Suh, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 3383. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Devin DeLuna, Audrey Netzel, Jamie Dietze, Brett Andrew Begley, Jideofor Ndulue, Donny Suh; A Comparison in Precision and Accuracy of the Conventional Syringe to the Suh Precision Syringe. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):3383.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Utmost stability is required to perform intravitreal injections; however, the conventional syringe presents difficulties that can compromise control of the device. A comparative study was performed to compare the accuracy, precision, and handling of a conventional 1mL tuberculin syringe to the Suh Precision Syringe (SPS), a new injection device designed to decrease operator error and to reduce adverse outcomes by providing a more ergonomic grip for intraocular injections.

Methods : 6 participants – an ophthalmologist, PGY1 ophthalmology resident, and 3 medical students — were instructed to inject a specified quantity of water first using a conventional syringe and then using the Suh Precision Syringe (SPS). Injections were made into 0.2 mL PCR tubes and a sheep eye while being recorded. The degree of needle movement made in the vertical plane, the forward-retraction movement, during each injection was measured using software to analyze the footage at 59.9 frames per second. The volume of water injected into the PCR tubes was measured to compare the accuracy and precision of the devices. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to assess for differences in median values between the SPS and conventional syringe.

Results : As compared to the conventional syringe, the Suh Precision Syringe (SPS) had significantly less forward-retraction movement when injecting into the sheep eye (P = 0.04). Similarly, the movement of the needle when injecting into the PCR tube was less while using the SPS compared with the conventional syringe; however, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). There was no significant difference in the volume of water expelled from both syringes (P = 0.28).

Conclusions : The SPS demonstrates significant potential to decrease the overall risk involved with injections through reduction of forward-retraction movement during device operation. This new syringe design also provides better control with injection depth and drug injection volume. With its more ergonomic design, the Suh Precision Syringe has the potential to decrease risks associated with intraocular injections by improving the accuracy and precision of the injection.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

 

Figure 2. Demonstration of software ruler tool used to measure forward-retraction movement.

Figure 2. Demonstration of software ruler tool used to measure forward-retraction movement.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×