July 2019
Volume 60, Issue 9
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2019
Trabecular Meshwork Motion in Normal Compared with Glaucoma Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • KAI GAO
    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
    Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China
  • Shaozhen SONG
    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Murray A Johnstone
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Ruikang K Wang
    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Joanne C Wen
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   KAI GAO, None; Shaozhen SONG, None; Murray Johnstone, None; Ruikang Wang, None; Joanne Wen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Latham grant.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2019, Vol.60, 4824. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      KAI GAO, Shaozhen SONG, Murray A Johnstone, Ruikang K Wang, Joanne C Wen; Trabecular Meshwork Motion in Normal Compared with Glaucoma Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019;60(9):4824.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To determine whether a phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PhS-OCT) system can be used to identify and quantitate differences in pulsatile motion of the trabecular meshwork (TM) in healthy control subjects vs. primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.

Methods : In this prospective pilot study, 6 healthy control subjects (11 eyes) and 2 POAG patients (4 eyes) were enrolled. A laboratory-based prototype PhS-OCT system was designed to measure pulsatile TM motion. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was obtained by iCare rebound tonometry before the procedure. PhS-OCT images were captured at a single cross-sectional position centered on the temporal limbus of both eyes in all participants. Consistent positioning was achieved as follows. Patients’ faces were oriented in a straight-ahead position. Patients then looked at a fixation target without moving their head, placing the eye in an optimal position for the PhS-OCT to acquire images with an identical protocol for each patient. A digital pulsimeter recording captured the signal from the cardiac pulse. A trigger synchronized the pulsimeter and PhS-OCT data. PhS-OCT images were analyzed to determine both maximum velocity (MV) and cumulative displacement (CD).

Results : The mean age of control and POAG subjects was 63.5±4.2 years (range 59-71 years) and 65±25.5 years (range 47-83 years), respectively. Mean IOPs for the control and POAG subjects were 13.3 ± 2.3 mmHg and 15.9 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively. A pulsatile TM tissue motion waveform synchronous with the digital pulse was observed using PhS-OCT in both control and POAG eyes (Fig. 1). The mean MV of control eyes was 21.38± 5.85 μm/s, whereas mean MV in POAG eyes was significantly lower (14.76 ± 2.85 μm/s, P=0.013). The mean CD in control eyes was 0.39 ± 0.28 μm whereas the mean CD in POAG eyes was also significantly lower at 0.17 ± 0.058 μm (P = 0.027).

Conclusions : POAG patients had reduce pulsatile movement of TM compared to control subjects, which may be due to the altered tissue stiffness or other biomaterial properties of the TM in POAG eyes. This pilot study suggests measurement of pulsatile movement of the TM with PhS-OCT may be a mechanism of characterizing outflow pathway abnormalities. If further studies confirm the initial findings, the differences may be of use clinically in identifying, monitoring and making management decisions in glaucoma.

This abstract was presented at the 2019 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Vancouver, Canada, April 28 - May 2, 2019.

 

Figure 1. OCT image showing pulsatile TM movement waveform using PhS-OCT.

Figure 1. OCT image showing pulsatile TM movement waveform using PhS-OCT.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×