Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Optimal methodology for lid wiper epitheliopathy assessment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christopher Lievens
    Southern College of Optometry, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Yvonne Norgett
    Department of Vision & Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Peter Allen
    Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Nancy Briggs
    Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University New South Wales, Austria
  • Marta Vianya-Estopa
    Department of Vision & Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Christopher Lievens, None; Yvonne Norgett, None; Peter Allen, None; Nancy Briggs, None; Marta Vianya-Estopa, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 106. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher Lievens, Yvonne Norgett, Peter Allen, Nancy Briggs, Marta Vianya-Estopa; Optimal methodology for lid wiper epitheliopathy assessment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):106.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :
Lid wiper epitheliopathy is a clinical sign that has been associated with dry eye disease. This study used a semi-automated method to identify the effect of drop instillation and post-dye viewing time on the absorption of lissamine green and sodium fluorescein on the upper eyelid in order to ascertain the optimal methodology for LWE assessment.

Methods :
In 37 participants with LWE, 1-drop of 1% LG (10μL) was applied to the superior bulbar conjunctiva in the right eye, and photographs of the lid margin were taken 1, 3, and 5 minutes after instillation. Measurements were repeated in the same eye following instillations of 2-drops of 1% LG. The same procedures were followed for application of 2% NaFl (2μL) to the left eye. Staining area was determined using software to detect and measure dye-stained images. Analysis used a linear mixed model with fixed effects of time, number of drops and their interaction.

Results :
For LG, multivariate analysis showed that time of drop instillation was significant (p=0.0091) as was the area of staining in the 2-drop versus 1-drop condition (p<0.0001). For NaFl, there was a significant effect of time (p<0.0001), drops (p<0.0001), and a time/drops interaction (p<0.0134), suggesting that both time and number of drops are important.

Conclusions :
A single drop of dye is insufficient to reveal the full extent of LWE staining. A 2-drop instillation is recommended and observation is recommended between 1-5 minutes (LG) and between 3-5 minutes (NaFl).

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×