June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Micropulsed Cyclophotocoagulation vs. Ahmed Valve Implantation.Comparison on Short-Term Efficacy and Safety to Treat Refractory Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Miriam Adriana Ramos-Hdez
    Unidad de Diagnóstico Temprano en Glaucoma, Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Jose A Paczka
    Instituto de Oftalmologia y Ciencias Visuales, Guadalajara, Mexico
    Unidad de Diagnóstico Temprano en Glaucoma, Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Sara Aurora Garcia y Otero Sánchez
    Instituto de Oftalmologia y Ciencias Visuales, Guadalajara, Mexico
    Asistencia en Investigación en Glaucoma, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Andrea Orozco Garcia
    Instituto de Oftalmologia y Ciencias Visuales, Guadalajara, Mexico
    Asistencia en Investigación en Glaucoma, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Isis Fernanda Vazquez
    Instituto de Oftalmologia y Ciencias Visuales, Guadalajara, Mexico
    Asistencia en Investigación en Glaucoma, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Montserrat Romo-Sainz
    Unidad de Diagnóstico Temprano en Glaucoma, Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Miriam Ramos-Hdez, None; Jose Paczka, None; Sara Aurora Garcia y Otero Sánchez, None; Andrea Orozco Garcia, None; Isis Vazquez, None; Montserrat Romo-Sainz, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 45. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Miriam Adriana Ramos-Hdez, Jose A Paczka, Sara Aurora Garcia y Otero Sánchez, Andrea Orozco Garcia, Isis Fernanda Vazquez, Montserrat Romo-Sainz; Micropulsed Cyclophotocoagulation vs. Ahmed Valve Implantation.Comparison on Short-Term Efficacy and Safety to Treat Refractory Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):45.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Several surgical approaches have been used to treat refractory glaucomas.The aim of this study is to investigate comparative efficacy and safety surgical outcomes in refractory glaucoma cases which underwent either micropulsed cyclophotocoagulation (MPCPC) versus Ahmed valve implantation with mitomycin C (AVI+MMC)

Methods : Retrospective review of medical records. Data from 53 eyes of 47 patients with diverse types of refractory glaucoma with at least 6 months of follow-up and complete information were included. Consecutive cases were divided into two groups: MPCPC (n=28) and AVI+MMC (n=25). Surgical success met the following criteria: (1) the postoperative IOP remained in a range of 5-21 mmHg and was reduced at least 30% compared to the baseline with or without medication (complete or qualified success), (2) there was no loss of light perception or vision-threatening severe complications, and (3) no additional glaucoma surgery was required. Any complications as well as their outcomes were registered.

Results : Follow-up range was 6-9 months for the MPCPC group and 13-21 months for the AVI+MMC group. Mean preop IOP, 37.6±9.6 mmHg (MPCPC) and 39.3±11.8 mmHg (AVI+MMC) (P=0.56), and the mean postop IOP, at 6 months follow-up, 14.1±3.6 mm Hg (MPCPC) and 16.3±4.9 mmHg (AVI+MMC) (P=0.06), were significantly different from baseline in both groups (P< 0.0001). Preop mean number of glaucoma medications were not significantly different between groups (P=0.72); the mean number of postop IOP-lowering medications was significantly lower in the MPCPC group compared with the AVI+MMC group at 6 months (P=0.002). No statistically significant difference between groups in postop BCVA and IOP was observed. Qualified success rate was 88.9% and 83.3% at 6 months after MPCPC and AVI+MMC, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in success rates between groups (P=0.69). Transient hypotony was the most common complication in both groups (10.7% vs. 16%; MPCPC vs. AVI+MMC). One corneal decompensation was registered in the AVI+MMC group.

Conclusions : This report on the short-term clinical efficacy comparing MPCPC vs. AVI+MMC demonstrated similar results in eyes with refractory glaucoma although a trend to have lower IOP values in the MPCPC group over its contrast group was shown. Incidence of complications yielded almost equivalent results.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×