June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Vision with Multifocal contact lenses in Myopes and Presbyopes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Shrilekha Vedhakrishnan
    Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Maria Vinas
    Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Pilar Casado Moreno
    Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Clara Benedi-Garcia
    Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Carlos Dorronsoro
    Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Susana Marcos
    Instituto de Optica, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Shrilekha Vedhakrishnan, None; Maria Vinas, None; Pilar Moreno, None; Clara Benedi-Garcia, None; Carlos Dorronsoro, None; Susana Marcos, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Spanish government grant FIS2017-84753-R, European Project PRESBYOPIA ERC-2011-AdG Ref. 294099, European Project MyFUN H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015 Ref. 675137
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 551. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shrilekha Vedhakrishnan, Maria Vinas, Pilar Casado Moreno, Clara Benedi-Garcia, Carlos Dorronsoro, Susana Marcos; Vision with Multifocal contact lenses in Myopes and Presbyopes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):551.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose : Multifocal contact lenses (MCLs), working under the principle of simultaneous vision are known solutions for Presbyopes, but they are also proposed to control the progression of Myopia. We evaluated visual performance with Center-Near design MCLs in Presbyopes and Myopes for different distances, viewing conditions and pupil diameters.

Methods : Measurements were performed in a group of 10 myopic subjects (MS, age: 24-27; SE: ±to-4.5D) and 5 presbyopes (PS, age: 47-58; SE:-2.75-+2.5D) on an Adaptive Optics system. All subjects were fitted with MCLs (three adds: LA: +1.25D; MA: +1.75D; HA: +2.5D), all with the same distance power (-2D). Residual defocus was corrected by a Badal System (BS). Decimal Visual Acuity (VA) was measured using an 8- Alternative Forced Choice procedure, tumbling E letter displayed on a CRT monitor (Visage, Cambridge research system), at different vergences (Far: 0D, Intermediate: +1.75D, Near: +2.50D). Measurements were performed both for paralyzed accommodation (PA, 5, 4 & 3 mm pupil), and natural accommodation (NA, natural pupil). Eye without the lens (NL) was measured as a control. The DOF was estimated as the dioptric range for which VA is 0.5 or better. The effect of the lens, addition, pupil diameter and accommodation was analyzed in the 2 study populations.

Results : Under NA, VA with MCLs ranged from 1.13-1.07 (MS) and 0.95-0.8 (PS) for far, and 1.13-1.07 (MS) and 0.5-0.45 (PS) for near, decreasing by a factor of 1.18/1.09 (MS/PS) for the LA, 1.24/1.29 (MS/PS) for the MA and 1.22/1.21 (MS/PS) for the HA at far. Under PA, average VA values are 1.32 times lower than the NA values in MS and 1.05 times in PS for 5mm Pupil. The average RMS difference between the TFVA curves under NA and PA (7/5mm pupils) was 0.23/0.04 (MS/PS, NL), 0.21/0.03 (MS/PS, LA), 0.17/0.06 (MS/PS, MA), 0.13/0.03 (MS/PS, HA). DOF ranged from -3D/-2.5D (NL) to 1D/1D (HA) in YS (NA/PA) and from -2D/-1.5D (NL) to 1D/1D (HA) in PS (NA/PA).

Conclusions : MCLs decrease VA at far, both in young subjects and presbyopes, while increasing DOF(under paralyzed accommodation in both groups, and natural conditions in presbyopes). Both effects are proportional to the magnitude of the lens addition. In accommodating young subjects, MCLs do not seem to compromise on near acuity and they are maintained as the NoLens state.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.