June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Prediction error and the effect of axial length on refractive status after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yiyun(Jessie) Liu
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Hong Qi
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Yufei Gao
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Rongjun Liu
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • tong sun
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Qianqian Lan
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Chenxi Hu
    Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yiyun(Jessie) Liu, None; Hong Qi, None; Yufei Gao, None; Rongjun Liu, None; tong sun, None; Qianqian Lan, None; Chenxi Hu, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Natural Science Foundation of China(81570813)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 594. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yiyun(Jessie) Liu, Hong Qi, Yufei Gao, Rongjun Liu, tong sun, Qianqian Lan, Chenxi Hu; Prediction error and the effect of axial length on refractive status after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):594.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the prediction error and the effect of axial length (AL) on refractive status in eyes implanted with segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Methods : Consecutive patients underwent SBL-3 (Lenstec, Inc., +3D) MIOLs implantation were enrolled in this study. IOL power was selected by Holladay II formula. PE was calculated as the difference between postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and target refraction, absolute PE was also calculated at 3 months follow-up. Eyes with AL more than 24.00 mm were included in Group A, while AL less than 24.00 mm were included in Group B, differences of PE and mean absolute PE were compared between the two groups.

Results : The study included 123 eyes of 77 patients with a mean age of 68.35±9.41 years and mean AL of 23. 44±1.18 mm. The mean PE was -0.56±0.55 diopters (D) (range -2.16 to 0.57 D) and mean absolute PE was 0.60±0.50 D (range 0-2.16 D). 51.4% percent of eyes were within ±0.50 D of the target SE refraction with 81.6% within ±1.00 D of intended correction. Group A showed significantly hyperopic PE than Group B (-0.60±0.61 D vs -0.41±0.38D, P=0.043). Mean absolute PE was also significantly smaller in Group A than Group B (0.43±0.36D vs 0.66±0.61D, P=0.015).

Conclusions : A mean myopia shift of 0.56D should be considered when choosing IOL power of SBL-3 implantation. PE was significantly hyperopic in eyes with AL more than 24.00 mm.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×