June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Next generation sequencing-based genetic testing reveals key diagnostic contribution by copy number variants in inherited retinal diseases
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Kirsty Wells
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Kati Kämpjärvi
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Lucia Guidugli
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Johanna Känsäkoski
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Pernilla von Nandelstadh
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Hanna Västinsalo
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Laura Sarantaus
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Katja Merkkiniemi
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Emma Mårtensson
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Jennifer Schleit
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Miko Valori
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Inka Saarinen
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Johanna Sistonen
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Juha Koskenvuo
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Sari Tuupanen
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Tero-Pekka Alastalo
    Blueprint Genetics, Finland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Kirsty Wells, Blueprint Genetics (E); Kati Kämpjärvi, Blueprint Genetics (E); Lucia Guidugli, Blueprint Genetics (E); Johanna Känsäkoski, Blueprint Genetics (E); Pernilla von Nandelstadh, Blueprint Genetics (E); Hanna Västinsalo, Blueprint Genetics (E); Laura Sarantaus, Blueprint Genetics (E); Katja Merkkiniemi, Blueprint Genetics (E); Emma Mårtensson, Blueprint Genetics (E); Jennifer Schleit, Blueprint Genetics (E); Miko Valori, Blueprint Genetics (E); Inka Saarinen, Blueprint Genetics (E); Johanna Sistonen, Blueprint Genetics (E); Juha Koskenvuo, Blueprint Genetics (E); Sari Tuupanen, Blueprint Genetics (E); Tero-Pekka Alastalo, Blueprint Genetics (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 838. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kirsty Wells, Kati Kämpjärvi, Lucia Guidugli, Johanna Känsäkoski, Pernilla von Nandelstadh, Hanna Västinsalo, Laura Sarantaus, Katja Merkkiniemi, Emma Mårtensson, Jennifer Schleit, Miko Valori, Inka Saarinen, Johanna Sistonen, Juha Koskenvuo, Sari Tuupanen, Tero-Pekka Alastalo; Next generation sequencing-based genetic testing reveals key diagnostic contribution by copy number variants in inherited retinal diseases. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):838.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are clinically and genetically diverse disorders, with a wide spectrum of causative genetic variation encompassing sequence alterations, copy number variants (CNVs) and other types of structural variants (SV). An understanding of the diagnostic significance of these different variation types is essential to maximize diagnostic yield in IRDs and select targeted therapies. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the rates and characteristics of CNVs, and the role of SVs caused by transposable elements, in a large RD cohort tested using a comprehensive next generation sequencing (NGS)-based RD panel.

Methods : 4581 patients referred for genetic testing between May 2017 and June 2019 were tested using an NGS panel covering 188 or 266 IRD-associated genes. Sequencing was by targeted OS-Seq on the Illumina NextSeq500 platform, or the IDT xGEN Exome Research Panel on the Illumina NovaSeq platform. CNVkit, an in-house developed deletion caller and IGV software were used to detect CNVs and transposable element-related SVs.

Results : A CNV in a gene consistent with the patient’s phenotype was reported in 4.8% of cases. The majority (90%) of CNVs were deletions, while the remaining 10% were copy number gains. Of all CNVs detected, 29% were single exon deletions, while 20% were 2-exon deletions, 28% partial gene deletions (>2 exons) and 14% whole gene deletions. CNVs were identified in 53 genes in total. USH2A and PRPF31 were enriched in CNVs compared to other genes (21% and 8.5% of all deletions respectively). Deletions were also detected in genes for which diagnostic gross deletions are not typically reported, such as ABCA4 and RPE65. The CHM and EYS genes were notable for the number of duplications detected (18% and 13.6% of all copy number gains respectively). In addition, we detected transposable element-related SVs including diagnostic Alu insertions in MAK, USH2A, CRB1 and CEP290, and a novel retrotransposon insertion in CHM.

Conclusions : Genetic testing incorporating high resolution CNV detection in a large cohort of RD patients reveals a key diagnostic contribution by CNVs. Our data demonstrates a significant contribution by single exon deletions, which are technically challenging to detect. Moreover, we present cases with diagnostic transposable elements, further broadening the landscape of genetic variation in IRD.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×