Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Comparative study of the meibography’s measurement with Antares topography and the Cobra HD’s eye fundus camera.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Patricio Quintanilla
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Fernando Garduño
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Anna Salinas
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • César Mendoza
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Katia Contreras
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Yadira Ríos
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Marcela Manzano
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Naomi García
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Manuel Garza
    Universidad de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Patricio Quintanilla, None; Fernando Garduño, None; Anna Salinas, None; César Mendoza, None; Katia Contreras, None; Yadira Ríos, None; Marcela Manzano, None; Naomi García, None; Manuel Garza, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 911. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Patricio Quintanilla, Fernando Garduño, Anna Salinas, César Mendoza, Katia Contreras, Yadira Ríos, Marcela Manzano, Naomi García, Manuel Garza; Comparative study of the meibography’s measurement with Antares topography and the Cobra HD’s eye fundus camera.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):911.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Objective: To know the comparability of Meibomian glands loss measurement between two equipment of Meibography.

Methods : Materials and Methods: A prospective, transversal and observational studies were conducted. All the participants answer a questionnaire of dry eye symptoms (OSDI), afterwards, it was carried out a complete ophthalmology evaluation and studies in the following order: (1) Fluorescein staining of the eye surface; (2) Non – invasive tear rupture time (Antares Topgrapgy); (3) Meibography with the Cobra and Antares equipment.

Results : Results: 56 right eyes of 56 patients were studied, with an average age of 33.88 ± 16.42 years, 53.%% were masculine. The average loss of Meibomian glands of the upper eyelid was of 18.60 ± 7.43 with Antares’s equipment and 17.70 ± 6.85 with Cobra’s equipment (p=0.079). The average loss of Meibomian glands of the lower eyelid was of 23.39 ± 8.31 with Antares equipment and 21.82 ± 6.29 with Cobra’s equipment (p=0.418). Statistically, there was not a significance difference. The concordance limits of the comparison between this two equipment was 6.159,-7.945 for the upper eyelid and 16.63,-13.48 for the lower eyelid.

Conclusions : Conclusions: Both equipment measure similarly the loss of the Meibomian glands, so they both can be use the same way.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×