June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Factors associated with visual outcomes and treatment discontinuation in eyes with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema in real-world settings
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Therlinder Lo
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • Daniella Lent-Schochet
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • Kieu-Yen Luu
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • Ajay E. Kuriyan
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Menachem Y. Weiss
    Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Aleksandra Rachitskaya
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Rishi P Singh
    Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Karen Michelle Wai
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • J. Peter Campbell
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Kishan Gupta
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Eric Nudleman
    Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, California, United States
  • Kevin C. Chen
    Shiley Eye Institute, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, California, United States
  • Glenn Yiu
    Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Therlinder Lo, None; Daniella Lent-Schochet, None; Kieu-Yen Luu, None; Ajay Kuriyan, Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Bausch Health (C), Genentech (F), Genentech (C), Regeneron (C), Second Sight (F); Menachem Weiss, None; Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Alcon (C), Allergan (C), Novartis (S), Zeiss (C); Rishi Singh, Alcon (C), Apellis (F), Bausch and Lomb (C), Graybug (F), Novartis (C), Regeneron (C), Zeiss (C); Karen Wai, None; J. Peter Campbell, Genentech (F); Kishan Gupta, None; Eric Nudleman, Alcon (C), Allergan (C); Kevin Chen, None; Glenn Yiu, Alcon (F), Alimera (C), Allergan (C), Carl Zeiss Meditec (C), Clearside Biomedical (F), Genentech (F), Genentech (C), Iridex (F), Iridex (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support   NIH Grant K08 EY026101, NIH Grant R21 EY031108, NIH Grant K12 EY027720, NIH Grant P30 EY10572, Career Development Award (JPC) from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 1314. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Therlinder Lo, Daniella Lent-Schochet, Kieu-Yen Luu, Ajay E. Kuriyan, Menachem Y. Weiss, Aleksandra Rachitskaya, Rishi P Singh, Karen Michelle Wai, J. Peter Campbell, Kishan Gupta, Eric Nudleman, Kevin C. Chen, Glenn Yiu; Factors associated with visual outcomes and treatment discontinuation in eyes with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema in real-world settings. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):1314.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Frequent intraocular injections for eyes with retinal vein occlusions (RVO) and macular edema are a clinical burden, but few studies have evaluated the factors associated with stopping these treatments. In this study, we evaluate clinical and anatomic predictors of 1) long-term visual outcomes and 2) successful discontinuation of intravitreal injections across 5 U.S. academic centers in real-world settings.

Methods : We performed a retrospective review of clinical records from patients diagnosed with RVO and macular edema with a minimum follow-up of 2 years at 5 U.S. academic centers between 2011-2015. Eyes with other retinal conditions or intraocular surgeries beside cataract extraction were excluded. We recorded demographic and clinical factors at baseline, as well as visual acuity (VA), central subfield thickness (CST), and cumulative treatments including anti-VEGF, steroid, and laser therapies at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with VA outcomes and successful treatment discontinuation for at least 6-months over the 2-year follow-up period.

Results : 214 eyes were evaluated in this study (mean age 69.8 ±11.9 years), including 38.3% branch, 52.3% central, and 9.3% hemi-retinal vein occlusions. Initial treatments included intravitreal anti-VEGF (89.7%), steroid (1.9%), and macular laser (0.9%). Patients received a median of 3 injections at month 3, 4 at month 6, 7 at month 12, and 10 at month 24, with 36.9% successfully stopping treatment. At 2 years, VA improved from mean logMAR 0.66 ±0.48 (Snellen 20/91) to 0.46 ±0.48 (Snellen 20/58), and mean CST improved from 486 ±174 μm to 323.5 ±114 μm. VA outcomes at 2 years were associated with VA at 6 months (P < 0.001) and BRVOs (P = 0.048). Successful discontinuation of treatment was associated with lower CST (P = 0.001) and fewer cumulative injections at 6 months (P = 0.001).

Conclusions : Intravitreal injections for RVO and macular edema in real-world settings produce less VA improvement than those observed in randomized clinical trials. Early VA gains predict visual outcomes at 2 years, while early reduction in CST may be associated with successful discontinuation of treatment.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×