Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
"CAN I SLEEP IN THESE?" - SynergEyes Hybrid Contact Lens vs. Brighten Optix EZ Orthokeratology Lens
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Trinh Doan
    SynergEyes, Carlsbad, California, United States
  • Wen-Pin Lin
    Brighten Optix, Taiwan
  • Richard Wu
    Brighten Optix, Taiwan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Trinh Doan, SynergEyes (E); Wen-Pin Lin, Brighten Optix (E); Richard Wu, Brighten Optix (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 1492. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Trinh Doan, Wen-Pin Lin, Richard Wu; "CAN I SLEEP IN THESE?" - SynergEyes Hybrid Contact Lens vs. Brighten Optix EZ Orthokeratology Lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):1492.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the safety of SynergEyes hybrid contact lens under closed-eye conditions. Comparative study between SynergEyes hybrid contact lens ( petrafocon A DK 130 center/ hem-larafilcon A DK 84 skirt) and Brighten Optix EZ orthokeratology lens (Hexafocon A DK 100) was conducted on rabbit eyes under closed-eye conditions for 22 days to determine significant histopathological differences.

Methods : Six healthy male New Zealand White rabbits were used in the study. Right eye of each rabbit was fitted with SynergEyes hybrid contact lens (test lens). Left eye of each rabbit was fitted with Brighten Optix EZ orthokeratology (orthoK) lens (control lens). Each lens (control and test lenses) was placed on the rabbit’s eye for 7-8 hours for 21 days. Lenses were cleaned and disinfected according to lens manufacture instructions after daily lens removal. Both eyes were examined daily prior to lens insertion and recorded using the Draize scoring system. Eyes were examined with 1% fluorescein stain after lens removal on Day 8, 15, and 22 and recorded using McDonald-Shadduck scoring system. The refractive error, corneal curvature, intraocular pressure (IOP), horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID), corneal center thickness, and endothelium cell of rabbits were taken at Day 0 and Day 22. Corneal tissue was fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin Y for microscopic evaluation at the end of the study.

Results : There was no significant difference between Day 0 and Day 22 of 100% of the rabbit for refractive error, IOP, HVID, corneal center thickness, and endothelium density. According to Draize scale for scoring ocular lesions of conjunctivae was Level 1. Based on McDonald Shadduck scoring system, trace of epithelial damage, mild of epithelial damage, and trace of conjunctival congestion were observed. Conjunctiva inflammatory cell infiltration and focal hyperplasia in stratified squamous corneal epithelium were observed in test and control eye of rabbits with minimal to mild severity.

Conclusions : The study results showed no significant histopathological differences between OrthoK lens (control lens) and hybrid lens (test lens). Both lenses did not induce significant clinical signs or ocular gross changes for 100% of the rabbits during the closed eye conditions. This study proved both Brighten Optix EZ OrthoK lens and SynergEyes Hybrid lens are safe for overnight wear.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×