Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Smartphone Application: Repeatability and Validity in Estimating Manifest Strabismus on Children and Adolescents.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aparna Raghuram
    Ophthalmology, Boston Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Ryan Nelson Chinn
    Ophthalmology, Boston Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Aparna Raghuram, None; Ryan Chinn, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Discovery Award, Boston Children's Ophthalmology Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 2132. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aparna Raghuram, Ryan Nelson Chinn; Smartphone Application: Repeatability and Validity in Estimating Manifest Strabismus on Children and Adolescents.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):2132.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We performed a prospective clinical study to compare the test-retest reliability of the newly developed strabismus application (App) in estimating horizontal strabismus magnitude and compare measurements to the clinical standard of eye alignment measure the unilateral prism cover test (PCT).

Methods : Data was collected from 35 patients (20 females, mean 10.51 ± 3.18 years) with manifest horizontal strabismus estimated by unilateral PCT (20 esotropes and 15 exotropes) and 32 control subjects (18 females, mean 9.15 ± 2.64 years) with no manifest horizontal deviation (0 to 3 exophoria) by alternate PCT. At least two good captures with the strabismus App were needed to be included for analysis. The mean strabismus measurement from the App and unilateral PCT was compared using paired t-test. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for the strabismus App and for strabismus App scores to unilateral PCT. Pearson correlation and regression analyses were also used to compare App measure and PCT.

Results : Failure of the App to capture data was noted in 3 strabismus and 2 control subjects. For controls the mean difference between the App and PCT was 1.4 prism diopters (Δ) (95% LOA: 3.4 to -1.3Δ). The mean strabismus measures was significantly less (P<0.001, 95% CI:-4.94 to -1.38Δ) in the App (mean = 20.90Δ ±10.38) compared to PCT (mean = 24.06Δ±11.55). Strabismus App showed strong test-retest reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.987; 95%CI: 0.97-0.99); mean difference was 2.18Δ±5.0; 95% LOA for test-retest reliability was –7.6 to 11.98Δ. Strabismus App strongly correlated with PCT (correlation coefficient: 0.987; 95%CI: 0.97 -0.99); mean difference was -3.02Δ±5.0; 95% LOA was –12.81 to 6.79Δ. App measurements were on average lower than the PCT (slope=0.86, intercept = -0.8, R2= 0.97, p<0.001) with root mean squared error of 4.4Δ diopters.

Conclusions : The smartphone strabismus app is a repeatable test, providing results that are comparable though not an exact match with the clinical standard of eye alignment measure the PCT. However the results show potential as a reliable test for screening.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×