June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
A 44 channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: interim functional vision results.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Maria Kolic
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Elizabeth Kate Baglin
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Sam Titchener
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Jessica Kvansakul
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Carla J Abbott
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Nicholas Barnes
    The Australian National University, Acton, Victoria, Australia
  • Myra McGuinness
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • William Kentler
    University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Kiera Young
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • janine walker
    Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Black Mountain, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Jonathan Yeoh
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • David Nayagam
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Chi D Luu
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Lauren N Ayton
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Matthew Petoe
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Penelope J Allen
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Maria Kolic, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Elizabeth Baglin, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Sam Titchener, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Jessica Kvansakul, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Carla Abbott, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Nicholas Barnes, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Bionic Vision Technologies (P); Myra McGuinness, None; William Kentler, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Kiera Young, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); janine walker, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Jonathan Yeoh, None; David Nayagam, Bionics Institute (P), Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Chi Luu, None; Lauren Ayton, None; Matthew Petoe, Bionics Institute (P), Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Penelope Allen, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Centre for Eye Research Australia (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 2199. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Maria Kolic, Elizabeth Kate Baglin, Sam Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, Carla J Abbott, Nicholas Barnes, Myra McGuinness, William Kentler, Kiera Young, janine walker, Jonathan Yeoh, David Nayagam, Chi D Luu, Lauren N Ayton, Matthew Petoe, Penelope J Allen; A 44 channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: interim functional vision results.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):2199.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The 44 channel (44Ch) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis is a second-generation bionic eye implant that follows on from a proof of concept study conducted between 2012 and 2014. The 44Ch implant is designed to provide artificial vision (phosphenes) to recipients with end stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). We aimed to compare the performance of functional vision tasks, pre-implant and post activation of the device.

Methods : The 44Ch suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis was unilaterally implanted in four participants (one female) with advanced RP, age range 39 to 66 years, between February and August 2018. After a 16-week period of vision rehabilitation training, participants were assessed on six functional vision tasks: table-top search (TTS), doorway detection (DWD), obstacle avoidance (OA), moving bar (MB), square localisation (SL) and grating acuity (GA). Assessment time points were prior to implantation and from post device activation, weeks 17 (W17), 20 (W20), 32 (W32) and 44 (W44). Data was pooled across all 4 participants and performance compared between device on and off from W17.

Results : On average the device improved participants’ ability to verbally locate objects (%) on the TTS at W17 (p=0.004), W20 (p=0.003), W32 (p<0.001) and W44 (p=0.002) compared to device off. Device also improved participants ability to successfully detect and touch (%) the doorway on the DWD: W17 (p=0.002), W20 (p=0.044), W32 (p=0.003) and W44 (p=0.001). More obstacles were detected during OA with device on (%): W17 (p=0.005), W20 (p<0.001), W32 (p=0.020) and W44 (P=0.013) compared to device off. With device on three participants could discriminate MB speeds ranging from 7 to 30 degrees per second. Average pointing error across all visits on SL was 10.3 ± 3.3° (device on) versus 27.7 ± 8.7° (device off), p < 0.001. Two participants had measurable grating acuity of 0.033 cycles-per-degree.

Conclusions : The interim data for the 44Ch suprachoroidal implant demonstrates overall performances on function vision tasks are better with device on compared to device off. The device has the capability to improve functional vision for people with profound vision loss due to RP.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×