Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Clinical and molecular diagnosis for 20 families with inherited retinal degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lea Bennett
    Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • John (P-W) Chiang
    Molecular Vision Laboratory, Oregon, United States
  • Bojana Radojevic
    Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lea Bennett, None; John (P-W) Chiang, None; Bojana Radojevic, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant 5R00EY027460
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 2420. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lea Bennett, John (P-W) Chiang, Bojana Radojevic; Clinical and molecular diagnosis for 20 families with inherited retinal degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):2420.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the clinical and molecular diagnosis for 20 patients diagnosed with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD).

Methods : After signing informed consent, peripheral blood or saliva was collected from 20 probands and 8 family members for segregation analysis. Genetic testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified laboratory. Segregation analysis was performed for 8 families and a minigene assay was used to assess 4 genetic variants predicted to alter splicing.

Results : Of the 20 IRD families, 9 families were recessive, 9 were dominant IRD, and 2 were for X-linked. Causative genetic variants were found in the genes RHO (5%), ADGRV1 (5%), RP2 (5%), USH2A (5%), PDE6A (5%), BEST1 (10%), RPGR (10%), CNGB1 (10%), PRPH2 (25%), AND ABCA4(20%) for the families evaluated. Results from molecular testing, segregation analysis, and/or minigene assays changed the clinical diagnosis for 6 (30%) families. Ambiguous clinical diagnosis for 2 families (10%) were clarified with molecular testing and the clinical diagnosis for 12 (60%) families with IRD were consistent with the molecular diagnosis.

Conclusions : Clinical diagnosis has revealed 8 novel variants and expands the collective knowledge of the genetic basis of IRD.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×