Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
The Impact of UV Cross-Linking on Corneal Stromal Cell Migration, Differentiation and Patterning
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Matthew Petroll
    Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Nishith Sripathi
    Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Miguel Miron-Mendoza
    Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Jacob Awkal
    Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Yukta Sunkara
    Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Hikaru Ikebe
    Ophthalmology, Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Matthew Petroll, None; Nishith Sripathi, None; Miguel Miron-Mendoza, None; Jacob Awkal, None; Yukta Sunkara, None; Hikaru Ikebe, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants R01 EY13322 and P30 EY030413, and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 2614. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matthew Petroll, Nishith Sripathi, Miguel Miron-Mendoza, Jacob Awkal, Yukta Sunkara, Hikaru Ikebe; The Impact of UV Cross-Linking on Corneal Stromal Cell Migration, Differentiation and Patterning. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):2614.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Previous studies have demonstrated that UV cross-linking (CXL) increases corneal stromal stiffness and produces alterations in extracellular matrix (ECM) microstructure. We assessed whether these changes modulate cell patterning and mechanical phenotype during stromal wound repopulation using multidimensional cellular imaging in vivo and in situ.

Methods : A total of 20 rabbits was included in this study. All rabbits underwent a 70 μm phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) with an excimer laser to remove the epithelium and basement membrane. In 12 rabbits, standard UV CXL was performed in the same eye immediately after PTK. Contralateral eyes served as controls. In vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF) was used to analyze corneal epithelial and stromal thickness, as well as stromal keratocyte activation and corneal haze. CMTF scans were collected one week pre-operatively, and at 7, 21 and 90 days after the procedure. A subset of rabbits was sacrificed at each time point, and corneas were fixed, labeled in situ for F-actin, and imaged using multiphoton fluorescence microscopy and second harmonic generation imaging.

Results : Following both PTK and PTK+CXL, an area of cell death was produced in the central corneal stroma. After PTK alone, the stroma was repopulated by keratocytes within 7 days. During repopulation, migrating cells formed thin chains that were coaligned with collagen lamellae. A similar pattern of migration was observed posterior to the cross-linked stromal tissue after PRK+CXL. In contrast, repopulation of the cross-linked anterior stromal region following PTK+CXL was significantly delayed, and was still not complete at 90 days in most rabbits. At days 7 and 21, keratocytes near the edge of the cross-linked stromal region formed clusters and expressed more stress fibers as compared to PTK alone. Interestingly, a thin layer of subepithelial fibrosis was observed on top of the native stroma 21 days after PTK alone, but this fibrotic layer did not form after PTK+CXL. Average corneal haze increased after both procedures, and peaked at day 21. By day 90 stromal haze was similar to pre-operative levels in all rabbits.

Conclusions : We hypothesize that CXL induced changes in ECM stiffness and porosity inhibit interlamellar stromal cell migration, and lead to a disruption of normal keratocyte patterning and increased keratocyte mechanical activation during healing.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×