Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
The Impact of Vision Impairment on Mentally Unhealthy Days Using National Surveillance Data, 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Dean A VanNasdale
    Optometry, Ohio State Univ College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Megan Hurley
    Optometry, Ohio State Univ College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • ERICA SHELTON
    Optometry, Ohio State Univ College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Lisa Jordan
    Optometry, Ohio State Univ College of Optometry, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Dean VanNasdale, None; Megan Hurley, None; ERICA SHELTON, None; Lisa Jordan, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  CDC/NACDD Grant VI2020A
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 2671. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dean A VanNasdale, Megan Hurley, ERICA SHELTON, Lisa Jordan; The Impact of Vision Impairment on Mentally Unhealthy Days Using National Surveillance Data, 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):2671.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess the impact of vision impairment (VI) on health-related quality of life, specifically mental health, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Methods : Data from each of the 50 states were extracted from the 2017 BRFSS dataset. Self-report of difficulty seeing with or without glasses was used to categorize VI vs non-VI. Self-report number of mentally unhealthy days was used to quantify quality of life. The number of unhealthy days was calculated for the VI and non-VI cohorts for each state. To assess the magnitude of any differences between the two populations, the ratios of the number of unhealthy days in the VI vs non-VI population were calculated for each state. Data were divided by demographic characteristics to compare age categories (19-39, 40-64, and 65+) and sex-specific differences.

Results : The mean number of physically unhealthy days in the non-VI population ranged from 2.9 (Minnesota) to 4.8 (West Virginia). The mean number of unhealthy days in the VI population was higher than in the non-VI population in each of the 50 states (t-test, p<0.001), ranging from 5.1 days (South Dakota) to 11.5 days (North Carolina). The range in the ratio of unhealthy days in the VI vs the non-VI population ranged from 1.7 (South Dakota) to 3.1 (Montana). Visually impaired females reported a higher number of mentally unhealthy days than males (t-test, p<0.001), and the VI cohort aged 40-64 reported the highest number of mentally unhealthy days (median across 50 states = 10.5 mentally unhealthy days).

Conclusions : The frequency of mentally unhealthy days represent a useful metric for quantifying health-related quality of life in the visually-impaired population. The BRFSS demonstrates a significantly higher number of mentally unhealthy days in the VI vs non-VI cohorts. The magnitude of healthy day difference between the VI vs non-VI cohorts demonstrates geographic variability, indicating a potential greater need for intervention strategies in states where lower quality of life in the VI population is highest.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×