June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
 

Sensitivity of the central cornea to cold stimuli

Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Fiona Stapleton
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Elizabeth Lam
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Angel Tu
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Klaus Ehrmann
    Brien Holden Vision Institute, New South Wales, Australia
    nthalmic, New South Wales, Australia
  • Blanka Golebiowski
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Kensington Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Fiona Stapleton, None; Elizabeth Lam, None; Angel Tu, None; Klaus Ehrmann, None; Blanka Golebiowski, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 3276. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Fiona Stapleton, Elizabeth Lam, Angel Tu, Klaus Ehrmann, Blanka Golebiowski;  

      Sensitivity of the central cornea to cold stimuli

      . Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):3276.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : <p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;">To examine the repeatability of central corneal sensitivity measurements using a liquid jet aesthesiometer (LJA, developed at the Brien Holden Vision Institute Ltd) using a cold stimulus, to explore the relationship between sensitivity to cold and warm stimuli and to explore the relationship between cold sensitivity and ocular comfort.</p>

Methods : <p style="margin: 0px; line-height: normal;"> </p> 30 normal participants (14 females:16 males; 15 contact lens wearers) aged 18-40 years (mean 23.3±1.8) were recruited. Corneal sensitivity was measured four times with the LJA, once using a stimulus at 36°C (warm) and three times at 15°C (cold). Measurements were taken on one eye, 30 minutes apart over 2.5 hours on the same day, at least 4 hours after waking. Stimuli were droplets of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) where the volume was varied to change the stimulus intensity. Thresholds were generated using an automated double staircase paradigm. Ocular comfort symptoms were measured using the Ocular Comfort Index (OCI).

Results : There were no statistically significant differences in cold thresholds between visits (Coefficient of Repeatability of ±0.322μL). The coefficient of variation for cold measurements was 59%. Lower thresholds were detected with cold compared with warm stimuli (p<0.0001; ANOVA). There was a significant negative association between cold threshold and discomfort in symptomatic individuals (OCI score >0) using the OCI questionnaire (r=-0.45, p=0.014).

Conclusions : The LJA is moderately repeatable for same-day measurements of central corneal sensitivity using a cold stimulus. Threshold stimulus volume was lower for the cold stimuli than those delivered at eye temperature. The relationship between cold threshold and discomfort symptoms warrants further exploration.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×