Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
The development of novel electroretinogram stimuli to detect glaucoma using a handheld device
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alan Kong
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Luca Della Santina
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Robert Stamper
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Neeti Parikh
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Taras Litvin
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Emily Mak
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Jennifer Currier
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Hoover Chan
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Yvonne Ou
    Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alan Kong, None; Luca Della Santina, None; Robert Stamper, None; Neeti Parikh, None; Taras Litvin, None; Emily Mak, None; Jennifer Currier, None; Hoover Chan, None; Yvonne Ou, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4043. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alan Kong, Luca Della Santina, Robert Stamper, Neeti Parikh, Taras Litvin, Emily Mak, Jennifer Currier, Hoover Chan, Yvonne Ou; The development of novel electroretinogram stimuli to detect glaucoma using a handheld device. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4043.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy that involves damage and subsequent death of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Functional assessment involves perimetry to quantify the degree of visual field loss, but this test is prone to subjectivity. Our laboratory has previously demonstrated that glaucoma results in the differential impairment of specific RGC types, with OFF-RGCs more vulnerable than ON-RGCs. Retinal function can be assessed with an electroretinogram (ERG), but standard ERG equipment is bulky and requires substantial testing time. In this study, we asked whether a handheld ERG recording device could be used in glaucoma patients to objectively detect relative changes to ON- and OFF-pathways.

Methods : Control and open-angle glaucoma subjects were recruited from UCSF glaucoma and comprehensive ophthalmology clinics. Patients with retinal diseases or significant cataracts were excluded. Data was recorded using the handheld ERG RETeval (LKC Technologies). We tested each eye with several standard electrophysiology paradigms set by the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vison (ISCEV). We also utilized a novel custom-written sinusoidal wave pattern of light in order to separate ON vs. OFF responses. The sinusoidal stimulus was modulated between 0.3 Hz and 50 Hz. Data was analyzed with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results : In total, 62 glaucoma eyes and 21 control eyes were tested. Baseline demographics were similar between the groups. The ERG results for the standard ISCEV protocols were largely similar to previous findings (e.g., PhNR amplitudes were depressed in glaucoma eyes). Our novel sinusoidal stimulus showed that for frequencies between 15 and 50 Hz, glaucoma eyes had significantly lower response amplitudes than control eyes. Most notably at 50 Hz, glaucoma eyes had a 48% reduction in ERG amplitude (control eyes: 3.50 ± 0.49 mV, glaucoma eyes: 1.82 ± 0.19 mV, p = 0.0012).

Conclusions : Our study is novel in that we utilized a sinusoidal light stimulus of varying frequencies. Studies in mice suggest that ERG responses to stimulus frequencies greater than 18 Hz reflect OFF pathway activity while 5 to 15 Hz reflect ON pathway activity. We found that the higher stimulus frequencies showed a greater decrease in response. A handheld ERG device using a sinusoidal wave pattern may provide an objective, fast, portable, and more comfortable diagnostic test to detect glaucoma.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×