Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Low-Contrast Visual Acuity in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Vision Initially Treated with Aflibercept, Laser, or Observation: An Ancillary Study from DRCR Retina Network Protocol V
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Wesley Thomas Beaulieu
    Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Wesley Beaulieu, Regeneron (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by the National Eye Institute and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases under award numbers UG1EY014231 and UG1EY023207. Regeneron provided aflibercept for the study and funds to the DRCR Retina Network to defray the study’s clinical site costs.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4874. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Wesley Thomas Beaulieu; Low-Contrast Visual Acuity in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema and Good Vision Initially Treated with Aflibercept, Laser, or Observation: An Ancillary Study from DRCR Retina Network Protocol V. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4874.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Low-contrast visual acuity (VA), which is important for driving, recognizing faces, and reading, is reduced in people with diabetes. We conducted an ancillary study within DRCR Retina Network Protocol V to compare changes in low-contrast VA 2 years after initiating treatment for diabetic macular edema in eyes with good vision.

Methods : Adults with diabetes and one study eye with diabetic macular edema (confirmed on OCT) and good VA (Snellen equivalent 20/25 or better) were randomly assigned to initial treatment with aflibercept, laser, or observation. Aflibercept was added in the laser and observation groups if high-contrast VA met pre-specified worsening criteria. For this ancillary study, low-contrast VA was measured at 2.5% contrast in 387 of 702 randomized participants. The Hochberg procedure was used to control the type 1 error rate for multiple treatment group comparisons.

Results : At baseline, median age was 60 years, 63% were male, and 70% were non-Hispanic white; mean (standard deviation) high-contrast VA letter score was 85.2 (3.6; Snellen equivalent 20/20) and mean low-contrast VA letter score was 47.6 (18.9; Snellen equivalent 20/125). The mean (standard deviation) change in low-contrast VA letter score from baseline at 2 years was 2.7 (20.1), -2.0 (19.6), and -3.1 (20.8) in the aflibercept, laser, and observation groups, respectively (mean difference [95% confidence interval]: aflibercept vs. laser=5.3 [-0.2 to 10.8], P=.06; aflibercept vs. observation=5.5 [-0.2 to 11.2], P=.06; laser vs. observation=0.2 [-4.6 to 5.0], P=.94); Between baseline and 2 years, low-contrast VA increased by 10 or more letters in 34% (32/93), 23% (27/117), and 24% (25/104) of eyes and worsened by 10 or more letters (among eyes with baseline low-contrast VA ≥10 letters) in 24% (21/87), 28% (30/107), and 32% (30/94) of eyes, with aflibercept, laser, and observation. The correlation between change in low- and high-contrast VA at 2 years was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.38-0.55).

Conclusions : There were no significant differences between the aflibercept, laser, and observation groups with respect to change in low-contrast VA from baseline at 2 years; however, due to the width of the confidence intervals, clinically relevant differences between the aflibercept group and the laser and observation groups cannot be ruled out.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×