Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Pentosan polysulfate maculopathy versus age-related macular degeneration: comparative assessment with multimodal imaging
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Joseph Christiansen
    Emory University, Georgia, United States
  • Alexander Barnes
    Emory University, Georgia, United States
  • Duncan Berry
    Emory University, Georgia, United States
  • Nieraj Jain
    Emory University, Georgia, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Joseph Christiansen, None; Alexander Barnes, None; Duncan Berry, None; Nieraj Jain, Foundation Fighting Blindness Career Development Award CD-C-0918-0748-EEC (F)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 1062. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Joseph Christiansen, Alexander Barnes, Duncan Berry, Nieraj Jain; Pentosan polysulfate maculopathy versus age-related macular degeneration: comparative assessment with multimodal imaging. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):1062.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Due to similarities in demographic characteristics and fundus appearance of these conditions, many patients with pentosan polysulfate maculopathy are initially diagnosed with age-related macular degeneration. This study investigates the hypothesis that pentosan polysulfate maculopathy manifests distinctive imaging features that can be differentiated from those found in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods : Several local databases were queried to identify patients seen at the Emory Eye Center between May 2014 and January 2019 with a diagnosis of interstitial cystitis. Records of the identified patients were reviewed to determine those that had adequate imaging that would allow for further classification. Ninety subjects met these eligibility criteria. Masked graders categorized patients based on imaging characteristics as follows: Category 1 – pentosan polysulfate maculopathy; Category 2 – AMD or drusen; Category 3 – neither; Category 4 – unsure.

Results : Of the ninety subjects evaluated, 79 (88%) were female and the median age was 61.5 years (range, 30 - 89). There were 17 subjects placed in category 1 (PPS maculopathy), and all 17 (100%) had exposure to PPS. There were 25 patients in category 2 (AMD or drusen) and 15 (60%) had PPS exposure, 47 patients in category 3 (neither) and 28 (60%) had exposure to PPS, and 1 patient in category 4 (unsure) and this patient had no PPS exposure. Mean cumulative exposure to pentosan polysulfate across categories 1-4 was 2.1kg, 0.36kg, 0.34kg, and 0 kg respectively (p<0.00001). Subjects with pentosan polysulfate maculopathy did not have typical drusen in the macula.

Conclusions : Although there are some similarities between pentosan polysulfate maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration, these two entities can be differentiated with the use of multimodal fundus imaging.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Representative case of PPS maculopathy in a 63 year old female with 2.48 kg cumulative exposure to PPS. This patient has characteristic macular pigment clumps (A) amidst a background of pale yellow fundus deposits. Near infrared reflectance imaging (B) and fundus autofluorescence imaging (C) demonstrate the extent of involved tissue, with a fairly dense arrangement of signal abnormalities in the macula. Macular pigment clumps are associated with corresponding hyperreflective nodules at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (D).

Representative case of PPS maculopathy in a 63 year old female with 2.48 kg cumulative exposure to PPS. This patient has characteristic macular pigment clumps (A) amidst a background of pale yellow fundus deposits. Near infrared reflectance imaging (B) and fundus autofluorescence imaging (C) demonstrate the extent of involved tissue, with a fairly dense arrangement of signal abnormalities in the macula. Macular pigment clumps are associated with corresponding hyperreflective nodules at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (D).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×