June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Modeling of Image Quality in Aspheric IOLs with Mild Tilt, Decentration, and Defocus.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • George Lau
    Bausch and Lomb, Irvine, California, United States
  • Jihong Xie
    Bausch and Lomb, Irvine, California, United States
  • Andrew Jones
    Bausch and Lomb, Irvine, California, United States
  • Valeri Kolesnitchenko
    Bausch and Lomb, Irvine, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   George Lau, Bausch and Lomb (E); Jihong Xie, Bausch and Lomb (E); Andrew Jones, Bausch and Lomb (E); Valeri Kolesnitchenko, Bausch and Lomb (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 576. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      George Lau, Jihong Xie, Andrew Jones, Valeri Kolesnitchenko; Modeling of Image Quality in Aspheric IOLs with Mild Tilt, Decentration, and Defocus.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):576.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare image quality of two aspheric IOL designs using Optical Raytracing under conditions of tilt, decentration and minor defocus.

Methods : An optical raytracing model was created in Zemax OpticStudio® using an Liou and Brennan model eye with spherical aberration (SA) of 0.21µm at 5mm. A simulation was performed with minor amounts tilt (5°) and decentration (0.25mm) and defocus (-0.25, +0.25D). The first type of IOL is designed to be free of spherical aberration (SA), similar to MX60E IOL from Bausch and Lomb, Inc. The second IOL is designed to have negative SA (similar to SN60WF IOL, Alcon). Both subjective (image resolution) and objective (Modulation Transfer Function, MTF) were simulated to compare image quality between the two types of aspheric IOL designs.

Results : Under conditions of tilt and decentration, the model eye with zero SA IOL showed less degradation of image quality (MTF, image resolution at the retina) when compare to the negative SA IOL. When the addition of mild defocus (-0.25, +0.25D) the zero SA IOL still performed better with less image degradation. Wavefront analysis shows that coma was larger with negative SA IOL, which mainly accounted for the observed worse image resolution.

Conclusions : The optical raytracing model demonstrated that an IOL with zero spherical aberration is more resistant to minor amounts of tilt, decentration, and defocus with better image quality resolution compare to an IOL with negative spherical aberration.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Graph 1: MTF Degradation due to IOL Misalignment with Spherical Aberration Free and Negative Spherical Aberration IOLs.

Graph 1: MTF Degradation due to IOL Misalignment with Spherical Aberration Free and Negative Spherical Aberration IOLs.

 

Figure 1: Image Quality Degradation with IOL Tilt (5°), Decentration (0.25mm) and Defocus (+/-0.25D)

Figure 1: Image Quality Degradation with IOL Tilt (5°), Decentration (0.25mm) and Defocus (+/-0.25D)

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×