Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Using Deep Learning Methods to Develop a Novel Predictive Glaucoma Progression Model
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andrew Lin
    Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
    Sackler Institute of Biomedical Sciences, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • David Fenyo
    Sackler Institute of Biomedical Sciences, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
  • Joel S Schuman
    Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
  • Gadi Wollstein
    Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
  • Hiroshi Ishikawa
    Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Andrew Lin, None; David Fenyo, None; Joel Schuman, Zeiss (P); Gadi Wollstein, None; Hiroshi Ishikawa, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH: R01-EY013178 and the Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 872. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew Lin, David Fenyo, Joel S Schuman, Gadi Wollstein, Hiroshi Ishikawa; Using Deep Learning Methods to Develop a Novel Predictive Glaucoma Progression Model. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):872.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To develop a novel glaucoma progression model with deep learning methods incorporating four major glaucoma biomarkers: VFI, MD, cRNFL and GCIPL.

Methods : 1023 eyes from 596 glaucoma/glaucoma-suspect patients were included from clinic. Two types of deep learning (DL) models were developed using Keras: an artificial neural network (ANN) and a recurrent neural network (RNN). The ANN contained five fully-connected (FC) layers, with a leaky rectified linear unit activation function and a dropout layer with a rate of 0.2. The RNN contained two long short-term memory layers, followed by a FC layer and a dropout layer with a rate of 0.2. Both models were trained to predict four major clinical biomarkers for glaucoma: visual field index (VFI), mean deviation (MD), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cRNFL) thickness, and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness. The models were trained using the first three visits to predict the fourth one year later. Train/validation/test splits were 65/15/20. A linear regression (LR) model was trained and evaluated on the same data for baseline comparison. Evaluation of the actual and predicted values were measured by mean absolute error (MAE). Statistical testing of each biomarker was performed between the DL models and LR model by paired Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results : The mean patient age was 62.4 ± 12.9 years. The baseline mean cRNFL: 76.9 ± 13.4 μm, GCIPL: 70.3 ± 9.9 μm, VFI: 90.3 ± 17.8%, and MD: -3.76 ± 6.13 dB. Table shows the MAE between the actual and predicted values of each of the four biomarkers across all three models. The ANN and RNN models showed statistically significantly smaller MAE compared to the LR model. In particular, the ANN model had the lowest MAE and was able to predict all four biomarkers significantly better than the LR model.

Conclusions : By harnessing the power of deep learning, we were able to accurately predict future values of both structural and functional measures of glaucomatous change one year later. This is possible as neural networks are able to recognize the intricate interplay between structural and functional changes in glaucoma that otherwise cannot be well captured in a conventional linear regression model.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Biomarker Prediction Results of Models (Mean Absolute Error)

Biomarker Prediction Results of Models (Mean Absolute Error)

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×