June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Big data analysis to uncover determinants of patient appointment compliance at Kresge Eye Institute
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alisha Khambati
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Lauren Dowell
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Daniel Juzych
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Jayashree Jayakumar
    Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Shwetha Rao
    Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Pooja Ramesh
    Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Jayashree Ravi
    Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Chaesik Kim
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Sarah Syeda
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Mark Juzych
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Ashok Kumar
    Kresge Eye Institute, Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alisha Khambati, None; Lauren Dowell, None; Daniel Juzych, None; Jayashree Jayakumar, None; Shwetha Rao, None; Pooja Ramesh, None; Jayashree Ravi, None; Chaesik Kim, None; Sarah Syeda, None; Mark Juzych, None; Ashok Kumar, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 1583. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alisha Khambati, Lauren Dowell, Daniel Juzych, Jayashree Jayakumar, Shwetha Rao, Pooja Ramesh, Jayashree Ravi, Chaesik Kim, Sarah Syeda, Mark Juzych, Ashok Kumar; Big data analysis to uncover determinants of patient appointment compliance at Kresge Eye Institute. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):1583.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Patient appointment compliance (AC) remains a major obstacle to the physician-patient relationship and in health care delivery. This study aims to uncover appointment and patient characteristics functioning as determinants to AC at Kresge Eye Institute (KEI).

Methods : Retrospective analysis of electronic medical records (EMR) was performed across all appointments scheduled 01/2014 to 12/31/2018 at KEI’s 23 out-patient Michigan locations. Patient arrival to appointment was classified as compliant (CO) and patient cancellation/no-show was classified as non-compliant (NC). Driving distance (DD) was generated from patient zip code. Appointment rank (appt rank) describes relative chronology in patient appointments. The following statistical analyses were used: chi-square (categorical and binary variables), Mann-Whitney U (continuous variables), and logistic regression (to control for covariates).

Results : A total of 835,207 appointments across 13 ophthalmic specialties were studied. Our population was predominantly African American (59.65%), female (60.5%), and mean age at appointment was 57.6 yrs (IQR: 47.4-71.4; SD 20). Medicare was the most frequent primary insurance at 258,414 appointments. Mean DD was 17.4 miles (range 0.3-578; SD 9.3). Overall, 60.3% of appointments were classified as CO.
Relative to NC, CO appointments were associated with patients who were older (62.8 vs. 58.8 years; p<0.00001), male (40.1% vs. 38%; p<0.0001), higher appointment rank (7 vs. 6; p<0.00001), and Medicare insurance (32.2% vs. 29.1%; p<0.0001). Retina and Glaucoma specialties had significantly more CO than NC patients (p<0.0001). DD differed significantly across CO and NC (CO IQR:13.4 to 20 miles; NC IQR: 16.8 to 20 miles). When covariates were controlled for (DD, age, race, sex, specialty, scheduling location/provider), then DD was found to be a significant predictor of AC (p<0.0001, OR: 0.997, 95 CI: 0.996 to 0.997)- though the most powerful predictor was sex (p<0.0001, OR: 1.087, 95 CI: 1.05 to 1.12).

Conclusions : Demographic and administrative characteristics were found to be associated with AC. It is notable that driving distance was found to be associated with AC even when all other confounders were controlled for. Interestingly, patient sex was found to be the most powerful predictor of AC. In the future, patient accessibility and satisfaction can be considered with AC to better the quality of care.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×