Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Risk factors associated with blindness at long-term follow-up after treatment for retinopathy of prematurity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Melanie T Almonte
    Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Western Eye Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Rahila Zakir
    Western Eye Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
    Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • M Francesca Cordeiro
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • Edmund Schulenburg
    Western Eye Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Melanie Almonte, None; Rahila Zakir, None; M Francesca Cordeiro, None; Edmund Schulenburg, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Imperial Health Charity Pre-Doctoral Fellowship Grant RFPrD1920/106
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4594. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Melanie T Almonte, Rahila Zakir, M Francesca Cordeiro, Edmund Schulenburg; Risk factors associated with blindness at long-term follow-up after treatment for retinopathy of prematurity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4594.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. At the highest risk of developing the disease are severely premature (under 32 weeks gestational age) low birth weight (under 1500 grams) infants. As more babies are being born premature<span style="font-size:10.8333px"> </span>and more severely premature babies are surviving, cases of ROP are increasing.

The purpose of this study is to examine the association between risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and risk of blindness at long-term follow-up.

Methods : Design
Case control of a retrospective cohort

Methods
Study population: Infants treated with cryotherapy for ROP between 1984 – 1999 were followed up to 2001.
Setting: St Mary’s Hospital and Queen Charlottes Hospital, part of Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Primary outcome: blindness (>1.3 LogMAR). WHO Definitions for Blindness was used.
Risk factors assessed: gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), post-menstrual age (PMA) at treatment, gender, and treatment decade.
Missing data: Were assumed to be missing completely at random and a joint multiple imputation approach was employed.
Analysis: Univariate logistic regression models were created to assess the relationship between blindness and each risk factor.

Results : Of 69 eyes in 35 infants, 26 (37.7%) eyes were blind. In the univariate analysis, only GA (OR 0.22, 95%CI 0.05-0.95, p=0.04) was shown to be a statistically significant risk factor for having at least one blind eye.

Conclusions : For children born in the 1980s/1990s in this sample, gestational age proved to be a strong risk factor for being blind in one eye at long-term follow-up. Though birth weight, treatment post-menstrual age, gender nor decade treated proved to be statistically significant. A larger sample size as well as more data on other important risk factors including: weight gain, length of hospital stay and oxygenation history are needed in order to draw firmer conclusions.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Table 1. Demographics and distribution of risk factors in the population

Table 1. Demographics and distribution of risk factors in the population

 

Table 2. Results of univariate logistic regression analysis

Table 2. Results of univariate logistic regression analysis

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×