Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Fixation techniques for Electronic Keratoprosthesis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ibraim Vieira
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Victoria Fan
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Mark Rosenblatt
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Charles Yu
    Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ibraim Vieira, None; Victoria Fan, None; Mark Rosenblatt, Board of trustees of the University of Illinois (P); Charles Yu, Board of trustees of the University of Illinois (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Department of Defense VR180058 (CY), National Eye Institute K08EY027459 (CY), P30EY001792 (MR), Research to Prevent Blindness, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) -Finance Code 001.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 3575. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ibraim Vieira, Victoria Fan, Mark Rosenblatt, Charles Yu; Fixation techniques for Electronic Keratoprosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):3575.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The electronic keratoprosthesis (or intraocular projector) is a novel approach for restoring vision in patients with intractable corneal blindness. It consists of a crystalline lens sized powered implant fixated behind the iris which projects light directly onto the macula. However, no intraocular implants of such a design have previously been implanted. We seek to evaluate feasibility and safety of different fixation techniques for this type of implant.

Methods : Three functional prototypes were produced. We evaluated three different fixation techniques in 3 living pigs. The first consisted of loops for suture fixation, the second haptic without suture fixation and lastly channel for suture passage. Loops were approximately 1 mm in size, and constructed of 5-0 Prolene suture material and adhered to the device housing using biocompatible adhesive. The haptics were also made of 5-0 Prolene material, and were approximately 5 mm in length. The channels were developed as an integral part of the 3D printed device housing, one at each corner of the bottom part (figure 1). During the surgery a partial open sky 8 mm trephination was used to insert the implant into the eye, then the respective fixation techniques were used. The open sky incision was closed at the end of surgery (figure 2) and the pigs were maintained for 3 months after implantation.

Results : The passage of sutures through the sclera in the loop design required extensive tissue manipulation, resulted in large amounts of intraocular hemorrhage and required a longer duration of the surgery and was found to be less than ideal. Both the haptic and channel design were able to accomplish in an expedient manner with minimal hemorrhage and remained stable over three months. All three devices remained functional at three months.

Conclusions : We here developed and tested three techniques for fixation of intraocular electronic devices in the mid vitreous in three pigs over three months. This is the first study of fixation of intraocular electronics which can provide a new means of vision restoration.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1. Bottom part of the projector with 4 sutures channels.

Figure 1. Bottom part of the projector with 4 sutures channels.

 

Figure 2. Pig with haptic design and powered on intraocular implant.

Figure 2. Pig with haptic design and powered on intraocular implant.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×