Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Fluctuations in Central Foveal Thickness and Vision Outcomes With Anti-VEGF Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Veeral Sheth
    University Retina and Macula Associates, Lemont, Illinois, United States
  • Steven Blotner
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Mila Malhotra
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Mitchell D'Rozario
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Shamika Gune
    Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Veeral Sheth, Genentech, Inc. (C); Steven Blotner, Genentech, Inc. (E); Mila Malhotra, Genentech, Inc. (E); Mitchell D'Rozario, Genentech, Inc. (E); Shamika Gune, Genentech, Inc. (E)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA, USA) provided support for the study and participated in the study design; conducting the study; and data collection, management, and interpretation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4224. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Veeral Sheth, Steven Blotner, Mila Malhotra, Mitchell D'Rozario, Shamika Gune; Fluctuations in Central Foveal Thickness and Vision Outcomes With Anti-VEGF Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4224.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To describe the relationship between fluctuations in central foveal thickness (CFT) and vision outcomes in the HARBOR trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Methods : In HARBOR (NCT00891735), treatment-naïve patients were randomized to monthly or as-needed (PRN) intravitreal ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 2.0 mg) for 24 months. Post hoc analyses included patients with ≥ 16 evaluable OCT images from month 3 (after 3 monthly loading doses), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) data at baseline and month 24. After month 3, CFT data were grouped into 3-month intervals through month 24, and “bounces” were counted for every ≥ 50-µm difference between the minimum and maximum CFT value within an interval, and between 2 consecutive intervals. Associations between bounces in CFT and vision outcomes at month 24 were compared between patients randomized to monthly versus PRN ranibizumab (0.5 mg and 2.0 mg arms pooled).

Results : Analyses included 849 patients randomized to monthly (n = 427) or PRN (n = 422) ranibizumab. By design, PRN-treated patients exhibited more bounces in CFT from months 3 through 24 than those treated monthly (Figure 1; mean [95% CI], 8.5 [8.0, 9.0] vs 3.4 [2.9, 3.9]). After adjusting for baseline BCVA, mean (95% CI) vision gains from baseline at month 24 were similar between monthly- and PRN-treated patients with 0–3 bounces in CFT (+10.4 [8.6, 12.2] letters vs +10.3 [7.7, 12.9] letters). In patients with 4–21 bounces in CFT from months 3 through 24, adjusted mean (95% CI) BCVA gains in those who received monthly or PRN treatment decreased to +9.5 (7.1, 12.0) letters and +7.4 (5.7, 9.1) letters, respectively. When patients were stratified by bounce quartile, adjusted mean vision gains were smallest among the monthly and PRN subgroups with 11–21 bounces in CFT (Figure 2).

Conclusions : This post hoc analysis demonstrated a trend for numerically smaller vision gains among patients who exhibited greater fluctuations in CFT during the HARBOR trial. Further studies should assess whether early bounces in CFT may predict longer-term treatment responses, and may be used to optimize injection intervals and vision outcomes.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1. Distribution of monthly- and PRN-treated patients across CFT bounce quartiles

Figure 1. Distribution of monthly- and PRN-treated patients across CFT bounce quartiles

 

Figure 2. Least squares (LS) mean (± 95% CI) vision gains with monthly or PRN ranibizumab, stratified by CFT bounce quartile

Figure 2. Least squares (LS) mean (± 95% CI) vision gains with monthly or PRN ranibizumab, stratified by CFT bounce quartile

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×