Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Clinical utility of the artificial intelligence enabled dashboard for glaucoma monitoring
Siamak Yousefi; Tobias Elze; Louis Pasquale; Osamah Saeedi; Mengyu Wang; Lucy Shen; Sara Wellik; C Gustavo De Moraes; Jonathan S Myers; Michael V Boland
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Siamak Yousefi
    Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Tobias Elze
    Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, United States
  • Louis Pasquale
    Ophthalmology, Eye and Vision Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
  • Osamah Saeedi
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland, Maryland, United States
  • Mengyu Wang
    Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, United States
  • Lucy Shen
    Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, United States
  • Sara Wellik
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida, United States
  • C Gustavo De Moraes
    Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University, New York, United States
  • Jonathan S Myers
    Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Michael V Boland
    Wilmer Eye Institute and Division of Health Sciences Informatics, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Siamak Yousefi, None; Tobias Elze, None; Louis Pasquale, Bauch+Lomb (C), Embedded Bioscience (C), Eyenovia (C), Verily (C); Osamah Saeedi, None; Mengyu Wang, None; Lucy Shen, None; Sara Wellik, None; C Gustavo De Moraes, None; Jonathan Myers, None; Michael Boland, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY030142 ; NIH Grant EY028631 ; NEI Grant EY030575 ; NIH Grant P30EY003790 ; Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), New York, NY
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4526. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      User Alerts
      You are adding an alert for:
      Clinical utility of the artificial intelligence enabled dashboard for glaucoma monitoring
      You will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. You can manage this and all other alerts in My Account
      The alert will be sent to:
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation
      Citation

      Siamak Yousefi, Tobias Elze, Louis Pasquale, Osamah Saeedi, Mengyu Wang, Lucy Shen, Sara Wellik, C Gustavo De Moraes, Jonathan S Myers, Michael V Boland; Clinical utility of the artificial intelligence enabled dashboard for glaucoma monitoring. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4526.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
    • Get Permissions
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To validate an artificial intelligence enabled dashboard for monitoring glaucoma using automated visual field (VF) tests

Methods : We developed the initial dashboard using 13,231 cross-sectional VF tests and applied principal component analysis (PCA) and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) to extract global and local characteristics of the patterns of VF loss (Yousefi et al., Image and Vision Computing New Zealand; IVCNZ, 2018:1-6). To validate the dashboard and investigate its clinical utility, we used VF sequences from two independent datasets. The first dataset included 133 eyes of glaucoma patients (each with 10 VF tests collected every week over 10 consecutive weeks) at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK, that were likely stable in such a short time. The second dataset included 154 eyes of glaucoma patients (average 9.3 tests) from the Glaucoma Research Network (GRN) with a consensus by six different algorithms that they were progressing. We projected the sequences of VFs of the eyes in these benchmark datasets and computed the specificity (using Moorfields dataset; Fig. 1) and sensitivity (using GRN dataset; Fig. 2) of the dashboard based on the trajectory direction towards glaucoma worsening and its length.

Results : A total of 125 eyes from the Moorfields benchmark dataset with confirmed non-progression consistently represented no progression on the dashboard, equivalent to specificity of 94%. A total of 119 eyes from GRN with confirmed progression consistently represented progression on the dashboard, equivalent to sensitivity of 77%.

Conclusions : We validated the clinical utility of the artificial intelligence enabled dashboard for glaucoma monitoring using longitudinal VFs from independent datasets. The dashboard had an excellent specificity and reasonable sensitivity. The proposed dashboard could be useful in clinical practice and glaucoma research for monitoring glaucoma on a user-friendly screen.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1. VF sequences of 133 stable eyes were tracked on dashboard. Red color indicates likely progression, blue represents possibly progression (borderline), and black indicates no progression. Green circles represent the first visit of the patient.
View OriginalDownload Slide

Figure 1. VF sequences of 133 stable eyes were tracked on dashboard. Red color indicates likely progression, blue represents possibly progression (borderline), and black indicates no progression. Green circles represent the first visit of the patient.

Figure 1. VF sequences of 133 stable eyes were tracked on dashboard. Red color indicates likely progression, blue represents possibly progression (borderline), and black indicates no progression. Green circles represent the first visit of the patient.

Figure 1. VF sequences of 133 stable eyes were tracked on dashboard. Red color indicates likely progression, blue represents possibly progression (borderline), and black indicates no progression. Green circles represent the first visit of the patient.
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Figure 2. VF sequences of 154 eyes with consensus on progression based on six different algorithms were tracked and presented on the dashboard.
View OriginalDownload Slide

Figure 2. VF sequences of 154 eyes with consensus on progression based on six different algorithms were tracked and presented on the dashboard.

Figure 2. VF sequences of 154 eyes with consensus on progression based on six different algorithms were tracked and presented on the dashboard.

Figure 2. VF sequences of 154 eyes with consensus on progression based on six different algorithms were tracked and presented on the dashboard.
View OriginalDownload Slide

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
Copyright © 2025 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.Accept