June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Structure-Function Model for Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Microperimetry Data
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Bethany Elora Higgins
    City, University of London, London, ENGLAND, United Kingdom
  • Giovanni Montesano
    City, University of London, London, ENGLAND, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Konstantinos Balaskas
    Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Timos Naskas
    Queen's University of Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Frank Kee
    Queen's University of Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Usha Chakravarthy
    Queen's University of Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Ruth E Hogg
    Queen's University of Belfast, United Kingdom
  • David P. Crabb
    City, University of London, London, ENGLAND, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Bethany Higgins, None; Giovanni Montesano, None; Konstantinos Balaskas, None; Timos Naskas, None; Frank Kee, None; Usha Chakravarthy, Bayer (F); Ruth Hogg, Novartis (F), Optos plc (F); David Crabb, Allergan (F), Allergan (R), Bayer (R), Santen (F), Santen (R), Thea (R)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 3241. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bethany Elora Higgins, Giovanni Montesano, Konstantinos Balaskas, Timos Naskas, Frank Kee, Usha Chakravarthy, Ruth E Hogg, David P. Crabb; Structure-Function Model for Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Microperimetry Data. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):3241.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Better methods for detecting subtle changes in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) are needed for trials of new therapies for the condition. One idea is to improve the precision of measures of visual function from Microperimetry (MP) by using structural information acquired by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). We test the hypothesis that structural parameters such as drusen thickness and reflectivity of photoreceptors can be used to model MP sensitivity in people with macular drusen.

Methods : Analysis of mesopic MP (MAIA, CenterVue) and OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) data collected as part of the Northern Ireland Sensory Ageing Study was completed in 83 people with drusen (>85 µm). Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) and Bruch’s Membrane were segmented using a semi-automated algorithm. Fundus images from MP and the OCT device were registered to map sensitivity values onto the OCT structural data (Fig 1). Average RPE elevation (taken here as drusen thickness) and photoreceptor reflectivity were calculated for each MP test location. The structure-function relationship was analysed using a multivariate linear mixed effect model correcting for location eccentricity and age.

Results : Subjects had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age and visual acuity of 75 (52, 82) years and 81 (69, 90) letters respectively. Both drusen thickness and photoreceptor reflectivity were significant predictors of MP sensitivity (p < 0.001 for both). Mean Absolute Error for prediction was 2.32 dB for the full model, 2.33 dB for photoreceptor reflectivity alone and 2.38 dB for drusen thickness alone (Fig 2).

Conclusions : This model allows structural parameters to predict MP sensitivity in people with drusen. With implementation, this structure-function model has the potential to build structural information into functional testing of disease progression in iAMD.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1. Example of RPE elevation map (left panel, thicker locations in yellow). The location tested with microperimetry (right panel) are reported as red circles.

Figure 1. Example of RPE elevation map (left panel, thicker locations in yellow). The location tested with microperimetry (right panel) are reported as red circles.

 

Figure 2. Predictive ability of the structure-function model. Horizontal and vertical axes show predicted and actual sensitivity values respectively. The solid line of unity represents the ideal perfect agreement (not regression line). The dashed lines represent published the 95% test-retest intervals for MP.

Figure 2. Predictive ability of the structure-function model. Horizontal and vertical axes show predicted and actual sensitivity values respectively. The solid line of unity represents the ideal perfect agreement (not regression line). The dashed lines represent published the 95% test-retest intervals for MP.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×