Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Increased Pupil Constriction to Blue Light in the Myopic Guinea Pig Eye
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nikytta Morton
    Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
  • William Myles
    Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
  • Sally A McFadden
    Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nikytta Morton, None; William Myles, None; Sally McFadden, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  G1801044 HMRI and Lions Australia (CI:SMcF)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 3417. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nikytta Morton, William Myles, Sally A McFadden; Increased Pupil Constriction to Blue Light in the Myopic Guinea Pig Eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):3417.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Early observations of increased prevalence of myopia in people who engage in near work blamed excess accommodation. The near accommodation reflex is accompanied by pupil constriction. The photopic pupil response (PR) is mediated by cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells containing melanopsin, with a peak sensitivity at 480nm. We asked whether the PR to 480nm light was modified in myopic mammalian eyes.

Methods : Guinea pigs wore a -6D lens on one eye from 6-13 days of age with white (n=6) or blue (n=6) luminance matched overhead LED lights on a 12/12 h cycle. After 7 days, lenses were removed and the direct PR to a blue LED (48010 nm) was repeatedly measured in each eye for 3 different luminance’s with an IR video camera in dark-adapted animals. Refractive error was subsequently measured with cycloplegia. The percent reduction in pupil diameter from the start of the trial to maximum constriction was calculated.

Results : Both groups developed myopia whether raised in blue or white light (difference between eyes of -5.8±1.3D, p<.01 and -3.6±0.6D, p<.05 respectively). In fellow eyes, PRs were 2.7% greater in animals raised in blue compared to white light (Fig. 1, p = .011). The PR of lens-wearing eyes was greater than fellow eyes (increase of 3.6% for blue; and 4.2% for luminance matched white light (Fig. 1, p=.040 and .006 respectively). The larger the starting size of the pupil, the greater the constriction but this could not explain the enhanced constriction in lens-wearing eyes since their pupil starting size was smaller than in control eyes (Blue: 4.45 Vs 4.36 mm, p=.003; White: 4.54 Vs. 4.45 mm, p=.03).

Conclusions : Young guinea pigs rapidly compensate for a -6D lens whether raised in blue or white light. One week of continuous negative lens wear significantly reduced pupil diameter and increased the PR to 480nm light. Exposure to hyperopic defocus requires greater accommodation and smaller pupils to see clearly. The pupil effects continued in myopic eyes when lenses were removed, suggesting residual effects persist and are not stimulus driven. The contribution by blue cones versus melanopsin to the observed enhanced pupil response in myopic eyes remains to be elucidated.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Fig. 1. PR to 480 nm light for animals raised in blue or white light. The myopic eye (hatched) has a greater PR than the control eye.

Fig. 1. PR to 480 nm light for animals raised in blue or white light. The myopic eye (hatched) has a greater PR than the control eye.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×