Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Modeling effects of localized material property changes on the shape and optical performance of the cornea
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Elizabeth Diaz Bueno
    University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Kathryn Colone
    University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Amy L Lerner
    University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Paul D Funkenbusch
    University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Elizabeth Diaz Bueno, None; Kathryn Colone, None; Amy Lerner, None; Paul Funkenbusch, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  CEIS, NYSTAR award C090130, SAC Incubator Program, Clerio Vision, Inc. award 058149-002, and NSF (IIP:1549700)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4721. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth Diaz Bueno, Kathryn Colone, Amy L Lerner, Paul D Funkenbusch; Modeling effects of localized material property changes on the shape and optical performance of the cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4721.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : LIRIC (Laser Induced Refractive Index Change) is a novel approach to vision correction which uses a femtosecond laser to modify stromal refractive index in a thin layer (∼20um). While biomechanical properties of the treated tissue are still unknown, this work investigates the potential effects (biomechanically and optically) of thin stromal layers modified to be either softer or stiffer than surrounding native tissue.

Methods : A linear isotropic finite element model of the cornea was used to simulate the effect of changes in cornea mechanical properties on shape and optical performance. The size and location of the treated zone were varied systematically. The radius was varied from 2.5 to 3.5 cm, the location varied between 80 and 120 μm below the anterior surface, and the number of modified layers varied from 1 to 5. The intensity of the softening/stiffening effect was varied as well. A sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the key determinants of mechanical and optical behavior among the different combinations of factors.

Results : Stiffer tissue (up to 3.5x native tissue) produced a flattening effect on the cornea surface. This effect introduced a negative shift up to 0.8 diopters for some sizes and locations of the LIRIC-treated pattern. Spherical aberration and defocus are modified over clinically meaningful thresholds in some cases. When the treated tissue is simulated as softer, the cornea bulges, producing a positive diopter shift. Extreme stiffening and softening effects are shown in Fig. 1. Besides the intensity of the stiffening/softening effect, the radius of the LIRIC pattern and the number of layers have the strongest optical influence (Fig. 2).

Conclusions : Modeling showed how the geometry and position of a modified layer in the stroma can affect shape and optical performance. Moreover, different optical corrections (e.g. refractive power, spherical aberration) are found to be sensitive to different aspects of biomechanical modification (e.g. diameter, number of layers), providing a potential pathway to control/tune these effects. Further study is needed to accurately characterize the material properties of treated tissue.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Fig. 1 Flattening and bulging due to stiffening and softening of the treated tissue, apical displacement under IOP is marked with white arrows. Deformation is exaggerated by 50 times.


Fig. 1 Flattening and bulging due to stiffening and softening of the treated tissue, apical displacement under IOP is marked with white arrows. Deformation is exaggerated by 50 times.


 

Fig. 2 Sensitivity of refractive power to different factors.

Fig. 2 Sensitivity of refractive power to different factors.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×