Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 7
June 2020
Volume 61, Issue 7
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2020
Eye movement compensation with eye tracking applied to Goldmann visual field results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jacques R Charlier
    Research, Metrovision, Perenchies, France
  • Danielle Tirtaine
    chru, LILLE, France
  • Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes
    chru, LILLE, France
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jacques Charlier, metrovision (F); Danielle Tirtaine, None; Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2020, Vol.61, 4620. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jacques R Charlier, Danielle Tirtaine, Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes; Eye movement compensation with eye tracking applied to Goldmann visual field results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(7):4620.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :
The purpose of this study was to evaluate if eye movement compensation with eye tracking improves Goldmann visual field results.

Methods :
Eye movements were recorded with an eye tracker during standard “manual” Goldmann perimetry performed on the MonCvONE full field projection perimeter (Metrovision, Perenchies, France).
The eye tracker measured the distance between the pupil center and the corneal reflection to provide an estimation of eye orientation. The pupil size was also measured to eliminate blinks and to compensate shifts of the pupil center resulting from pupil constriction.
25 exams performed on subjects with neuro-ophthalmic diseases were reprocessed after the exams to apply a compensation of eye movement shifts to the position of the patient’s responses.

Results : Eye movement compensation was found effective in 2 cases out of 25. The first case with a central scotoma and stable eccentric fixation, the seEye movement compensation was found effective in 2 cases out of 25. The first case with a central scotoma and stable eccentric fixation, the second with hemianopsia and shifts of fixation. In other cases, eye movement compensation was not effective because of eye movement instability (nystagmus, ..). However, the recording of eye movements was useful in all cases to document the reliability of the exam by providing information about the stability of fixation (BCEA) and about the waveform of abnormal eye movements (2 cases of nystagmus).
cond with hemianopsia and shifts of fixation. In other cases, eye movement compensation was not effective because of eye movement instability (nystagmus, ..). However, the recording of eye movements was useful in all cases to document the reliability of the exam by providing information about the stability of fixation (BCEA) and about the waveform of abnormal eye movements (2 cases of nystagmus).

Conclusions :
Eye movement analysis is useful to document the reliability of Goldmann visual field exams but eye movement compensation is effective only in a small percentage of cases.

This is a 2020 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×