Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 61, Issue 9
July 2020
Volume 61, Issue 9
Free
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   July 2020
Downstream effects of retinal gene therapy on the volume of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN): A functional and structural assessment
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mikhail Lipin
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Philip Cook
    Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, PHILADELPHIA, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Theresa Mowad
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Jean Bennett
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Albert Maguire
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Manzar Ashtari
    Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Mikhail Lipin, None; Philip Cook, None; Theresa Mowad, None; Jean Bennett, None; Albert Maguire, None; Manzar Ashtari, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI grant 1R21EY020662
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2020, Vol.61, PB0042. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mikhail Lipin, Philip Cook, Theresa Mowad, Jean Bennett, Albert Maguire, Manzar Ashtari; Downstream effects of retinal gene therapy on the volume of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN): A functional and structural assessment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(9):PB0042.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Retinal malfunctions are known to deteriorate downstream visual pathways. For example, optic tract, optic nerve and LGN in glaucoma patients significantly decrease in volume as compared to that of matched normal sighted controls (Lee JY et al., 2014). However, whether the deterioration is reversible has not been studied mostly due to the irreversibility of the retinal diseases. The recent advances in retinal gene therapy made possible the recovery of the retinal function. The purpose of the study was to find whether and how the regaining of the visual functions affects the volume of LGN.

Methods : Nine LCA2 patients underwent structural and functional MRI using a 3T system. Subjects received identical imaging protocol at baseline and 1 YR after their bilateral GT. To enable a precise measurement of the volume of LGN in MRI scans (Figure 1A), we applied a local 3D-edge detection algorithm that helped to visualize LGN (Figure 1B) and measure its volume. Visual stimulation was performed using checkerboard patterns with constant light intensity with a block design fMRI paradigm.

Results : The volume of LGN on the right side of patients’ brains before gene therapy was 165.1±38.1 mm3 (mean±SD). The volume of LGN increased to 179.8±41.2 mm3 (mean±SD) in one year after gene therapy. The increase in the volume was significant (P < 0.027, paired t-test). Interestingly, the increase in the volume of LGN correlated with the increase in functional activation of LGN area in response to visual stimuli (Figure 2). The LGN volumes on the left side of patients’ brains and on either side of the brains of normal sighted individuals are being processed.

Conclusions : Here we show through a combination of structural and fMRI that gene therapy in humans reverses the structural damage and re-establishes function to the main vision relay system in the brain.

This is a 2020 Imaging in the Eye Conference abstract.

 

Figure 1. A coronal slice of a patient’s brain with 0.8 mm resolution before (A) and after (B) local edge detection. Red arrow points at a triangle-shaped region with LGN.

Figure 1. A coronal slice of a patient’s brain with 0.8 mm resolution before (A) and after (B) local edge detection. Red arrow points at a triangle-shaped region with LGN.

 

Figure 2. A coronal slice of a patient’s brain showing functional activation (yellow to red) of LGN (at the cross-hairs) in response to flickering checkerboard before (A) and 1 year after (B) gene therapy. The statistical significance of the functional activation 1 year after gene therapy is much higher that of before the gene therapy (P < 0.005 vs. P < 0.05).

Figure 2. A coronal slice of a patient’s brain showing functional activation (yellow to red) of LGN (at the cross-hairs) in response to flickering checkerboard before (A) and 1 year after (B) gene therapy. The statistical significance of the functional activation 1 year after gene therapy is much higher that of before the gene therapy (P < 0.005 vs. P < 0.05).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×