July 2020
Volume 61, Issue 9
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   July 2020
Effects of OCTA scanning speed on image quality and clinical workflow
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Taylor Shagam
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., California, United States
  • Simon Antonio Bello
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., California, United States
  • Sophie Kubach
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., California, United States
  • Luis De Sisternes
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., California, United States
  • Thomas Callan
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., California, United States
  • Noli Graves
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., California, United States
  • Roger A. Goldberg
    Bay Area Retina Associates, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Taylor Shagam, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (E); Simon Bello, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (E); Sophie Kubach, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (E); Luis De Sisternes, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (E); Thomas Callan, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (E); Noli Graves, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (C); Roger Goldberg, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2020, Vol.61, PB0093. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Taylor Shagam, Simon Antonio Bello, Sophie Kubach, Luis De Sisternes, Thomas Callan, Noli Graves, Roger A. Goldberg; Effects of OCTA scanning speed on image quality and clinical workflow. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(9):PB0093.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose : In optical coherence tomography (OCT), it is well known that there is a trade-off between speed and scan quality. However, for OCT Angiography (OCTA), the trade-off has not yet been fully characterized, since the impact of speed on tracking and angiographic signal may affect overall quality. Eye care practitioners require good quality scans as well as a reasonable workflow. We conducted a study using a dual speed system to characterize the image quality and speed of acquisition as a function of A-scan speed.

Methods : A modified, dual speed, PLEX® Elite 9000 OCTA system (ZEISS, Dublin, CA) was used to image eyes with retinal pathology. Volunteers were divided into two groups and imaged using the following protocol:
3x3 mm (300x300), 6x6 mm (500x500), 9x9 mm (500x500), 12x12 mm (500x500), and 15x9 mm (500x834).
Group 1 was imaged with an OCT light source with an A-scan rate of 100 kHz, while group 2 acquisitions were made with an A-scan rate of 200 kHz. In all cases eye motion tracking was active, which re-scans any B-scan that presents motion >30 µm. Acquisition times were calculated by monitoring the scanning galvo electrical signals. A subject matter expert graded the superficial, deep and outer retina-choriocapillaris (ORCC) enface retinal slabs of each of these scans using a 1-5 scale. Acquisition times and image quality were then compared between the two groups. Statistical significance was established using a two-sample t-test with an α=0.05.

Results : A total of 25 eyes were imaged on each group. On average, we observed a 30-50% improvement in acquisition time, depending on the scan pattern. Larger scan patterns, which historically showed longer acquisition times, present the biggest improvement. 96% of all data acquired at 200kHz was captured in <25 seconds, while only 64% of data acquired at 100 kHz met this criterion. Similarly, images acquired at 200 kHz showed improved imaged quality, with grades ranging from 3 to 4.5 out of 5. For all patterns, grades were significantly higher when acquired at 200 kHz versus 100 kHz.

Conclusions : Our study shows that despite reduced light exposure times, increasing the scanning speed from 100 to 200 kHz yields higher quality OCTA en face images. Similarly, the increase in scanning speed significantly improves clinical workflows by reducing the imaging time, possibly allowing clinical personnel to image a higher number of patients.

This is a 2020 Imaging in the Eye Conference abstract.



This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.