July 2020
Volume 61, Issue 9
Free
ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference Abstract  |   July 2020
Ultra-low energy Photoacoustic Microscopy to Visualize Retinal Vasculature in Living Rabbit Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yannis Mantas Paulus
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Wei Zhang
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Yanxiu Li
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Van Phuc Nguyen
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Xueding Wang
    Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yannis Paulus, Allergan (C), Endra Life Sciences (C), EyeSonics LLC (S), Hedgefog Research Inc (C), MediBeacon Inc (F), PhotoSonoX LLC (S), Putnam Associated Consulting (C), University of Michigan (P); Wei Zhang, None; Yanxiu Li, None; Van Phuc Nguyen, None; Xueding Wang, EyeSonics LLC (S), PhotoSonoX LLC (S)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI Grant 1K08EY027458
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2020, Vol.61, PP0014. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yannis Mantas Paulus, Wei Zhang, Yanxiu Li, Van Phuc Nguyen, Xueding Wang; Ultra-low energy Photoacoustic Microscopy to Visualize Retinal Vasculature in Living Rabbit Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61(9):PP0014.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is an emerging hybrid imaging technology which can non-invasively evaluate optical absorption with high spatial resolution and deep penetration. Laser safety remains a major concern for clinical translation of PAM. To improve the safety of PAM, we develop, validate, and demonstrate the safety of an ultra-low energy PAM retinal imaging system in rabbit eyes down to 1% of the ANSI safety limit.

Methods : A high resolution multimodality PAM and OCT imaging system is modified to allow for ultra-low energy PAM using a tunable nanosecond pulsed OPO laser (405 – 2600 nm, pulse repetition rate 1 kHz, pulse duration 3 – 5 ns, NT-242, Ekspla) integrated into a Ganymede-II-HR Thorlabs OCT system with a custom-built needle ultrasound transducer with a central frequency of 25 MHz (Optosonic) . Following two-stage amplification and filtering, the signal was sent to 3 different channels of a multi-channel DAQ system (PX1500–4, Signatec) fully utilizing the dynamic range of the DAQ system. The 3 signals were averaged and normalized to the recorded laser energy to eliminate pulse energy fluctuation. To further enhance the SNR, a 3 by 3 median filter in the spatial domain was applied. The performance and safety of this system was evaluated on 5 Dutch-belted rabbits with ERG, OCT, photography, FAF, FA, ICGA, histology, and IHC for up to 1 month.

Results : The performance of the ultra-low energy PAM system was tested by imaging the retinal vasculature. Pulse energy levels of 1.6 nJ, 3.2 nJ, and 4.8 nJ, which are at 1%, 2%, and 3% of the ANSI safety limit, respectively, were used in imaging. Ultra-low energy PAM can image the retinal vasculature with sufficient contrast-to-noise ratio at 2% of the ANSI safety limit whereas conventional PAM at this energy had no visible vasculature (Fig 1). Fundus photography, OCT, FAF, ERG, histology, and IHC demonstrate no retinal damage at 2% of the ANSI safety limit.

Conclusions : By optimizing the imaging and data acquisition, the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved to allow for ultra-low energy PAM in rabbit eyes using 1% of the ANSI safety limit. A safety evaluation including functional and anatomic testing demonstrated no retinal damage after PAM imaging.

This is a 2020 Imaging in the Eye Conference abstract.

 

A. Ultralow energy photoacoustic microscopy system. B. Conventional PAM image with laser fluence at 2% of the ANSI safety limit. C. Ultralow energy PAM at 2% of the ANSI safety limit.

A. Ultralow energy photoacoustic microscopy system. B. Conventional PAM image with laser fluence at 2% of the ANSI safety limit. C. Ultralow energy PAM at 2% of the ANSI safety limit.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×