To our knowledge, this is the first study of in vivo retinal hemodynamics in SHR. In addition to smaller retinal arterioles, our findings in SHR included smaller retinal venules, faster arteriolar velocities, and markedly elevated vascular shear rates and more rapid mean circulation times despite a tendency toward a reduction in total retinal blood flow.
The microvascular response to an acute increase in velocity is an increase in diameter to limit shear forces on the vessel wall
14,15 in flow-mediated dilation. Normal levels of shear can be beneficial, mediating the release of the vasodilator nitric oxide and limiting leukocyte and platelet adhesion. However, elevated shear can induce increases in permeability (seen in the hypertensive retinal circulation) and in cell signaling, with an increase in endothelial intracellular calcium.
16 With the sustained hypertension in SHR (in contrast to the acute flow-mediated dilation scenario), elevations in arteriolar blood velocity are associated with smaller rather than larger diameters because of arteriolar wall remodeling, causing a substantial elevation in shear force on the vessel wall.
The elevated shear rates shown in
Figures 1 and
2 are likely to be underestimates of the increases in shear stress, as shear stress is the product of shear rate and viscosity. Blood viscosity has been found to be significantly increased in SHR
17,18 and in hypertensive individuals,
19 because of increases in both plasma viscosity and hematocrit. It is possible that the transmission of this force to the vasculature is the mechanism by which the elevated kinetic energy is dissipated going from the arterioles to venules in the SHR retina, with elevations in velocity seen primarily on the arteriolar side. In the WKY retina, shear rates are well controlled over a wide range of mean arterial blood pressures, but they are found to be higher (possibly in a linear relationship) with increasing blood pressures in SHR.
To our knowledge, the shear rate measurements made in this study are the first to be published for the in vivo SHR retina. However, acute responses to increased pressure in the retinal circulation have been made in other models, and are consistent with an autoregulatory limitation of blood flow over a range of pressures. For example, in rats in which arterial pressure was acutely elevated to 153 mm Hg (from 114 mm Hg baseline) by a balloon catheter partially occluding the descending aorta, retinal blood flow increased marginally before trending back toward basal levels over a period of a few minutes.
20 Acute increases in blood pressure in miniature pigs, using infusion of tyramine, increased retinal blood flow by only 8% with an increase in mean arterial blood pressure of 22%, and no measurable increase in blood flow was found with an increase in blood pressure of 31%.
21 In the same study, the range for autoregulation was exceeded when an acute 50% increase in blood pressure increased retinal blood flow by 57%. In cats, when ocular perfusion pressure increases acutely by more than 40 mm Hg (with inflation of a balloon in the descending aorta), substantial increases in both arteriolar shear rates and blood flow rates ensue.
22 In humans injected with tyramine, the range of autoregulation was found to be exceeded between a 30% and 40% increase in blood pressure, causing retinal blood flow increases of 11% and 32%, respectively.
23 A similar result in humans was found in which increases in blood pressure (induced by acute exercise) resulted in an increase in retinal blood flow only when the increase in blood pressure exceeded 41%.
24 The autoregulatory control is believed to be important for the retinal circulation, because of the lack of autonomic innervation. In contrast, sustained hypertension is typically associated with decreases in retinal blood flow. For example, in one study, capillary flow was found to decrease by ∼10% in long duration hypertensive patients.
25 In our study of the SHR retina, flow also tended to be lower.
The significantly more rapid mean circulation time through the SHR retina compared to WKY (
Fig. 3) would not be expected solely from the measured values of entering and exiting velocities in the arterioles and venules (
Figs. 1,
2). MCT can be defined as a length (L) divided by velocity (V), with L being a flow-weighted measure of the multitude of different pathways that can be taken between the arteriolar and venular sites. If the value of L does not change between SHR and WKY, we can say that (MCT × V)
WKY = (MCT × V)
SHR. Inserting our measured values of MCT into this equation (0.283 s for SHR; 0.456 s for WKY) and solving for SHR velocity, we have V
SHR = (0.456/0.283) × V
WKY = 1.61 × V
WKY. As shown in
Figures 1 and
2, the arteriolar and venular velocities in SHR compared to WKY were not higher by a factor of 1.61 (1.24 for arterioles; 1.07 for venules). Although we did not measure the extent to which retinal capillary velocities may have changed in SHR, it should be noted that in human hypertension, 10% to 22% decreases (rather than increases) in retinal capillary velocity have been reported.
26 If capillary velocity is not higher in SHR (than in WKY) by at least a factor of 1.61, then it must be considered that the microvascular pathways (L) may change.
One such change in the hypertensive retina that could alter the arterio-venular transit is vascular constriction in the arteriolar delivery from the superficial retina to the intermediate and deep capillary layers of the retina. As we have found previously for the diabetic rat retina,
12 this “shunting” of flow away from the deeper capillaries would result in considerably faster mean circulation times, at the expense of decreased red blood cell distribution to the deeper capillaries. In a potentially connected mechanism, it is possible that some capillaries will stop flowing, as reported in human hypertensive retinopathy,
25,27 with optical coherence tomographic angiography indicating a reduced capillary density in the deep retinal plexus with poorly controlled blood pressure.
28 Moreover, the decreases in capillary density can occur even in patients in whom blood pressure has been reasonably well controlled via medication.
29 In these scenarios explaining the significantly faster mean circulation times in SHR compared to WKY (exceptionally high capillary velocity; shunting of flow; decreases in capillary density), red blood cell distribution or adequate oxygenation of the retina are vulnerable.
One limitation of the study was that we did not include measures of intraocular pressure, which influences retinal blood flow and hemodynamics, and therefore could explain some of the differences between SHR and WKY rats. Although statistical power with N = 8 per group was sufficient for most comparisons in the study, the limited sample size was likely a contributing factor in our inability to state with certainty whether retinal blood flow was indeed lower in SHR compared to WKY rats (
Fig. 5). Another limitation of our study was the use of ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, which can affect retinal blood flow.
30 Although we have no reason to believe that this effect of anesthesia differs between WKY rats and SHR, this is a consideration that can be examined with other choices of anesthesia in future studies.
The hemodynamic changes seen in the SHR retina can be further investigated to examine the effects of elevated shear on permeability, endothelial signaling, and the development of a thickened basement membrane. Furthermore, the potential consequences of more rapid circulation times, and either highly elevated capillary velocities and/or shunting of flow, can be investigated in future studies with regard to oxygenation and function of the retina.