There currently are no mouse models available to mimic every aspect of dry AMD. We chose to use the NaIO
3 model, a model resulting in photoreceptor damage by primarily affecting the RPE
51 and that has a timeline of induction/degeneration that can be overlaid with the CIA model. Two weeks following the CIA booster injection, mice were injected with 50 mg/kg NaIO
3. Ten days following NaIO
3 injection, retinal morphology and function were assessed (
Fig. 4). Fundus photography demonstrated severe mottling of the RPE in NaIO
3-treated animals (
Fig. 4A) compared to controls or CIA mice (
Fig. 2A). While retinal thickness again demonstrated no change between control and CIA mice alone, thickness was decreased by ∼20% in NaIO
3-treated mice compared to controls. This decrease was further exacerbated by the presence of CIA, suggesting an additive effect (
Figs. 4A,
4B;
P ≤ 0.05). Please note that the damage caused by NaIO
3 made it too difficult to discern the different layers of the retina for additional and more detailed quantifications. Retinal thickness between female and male mice was found to be significantly different between NaIO
3 (
P ≤ 0.05) and CIA + NaIO
3 mice (
P ≤ 0.05;
Fig. 4B). However, a significant difference was observed only in the male mice between NaIO
3 and CIA + NaIO
3 (
P ≤ 0.05). ERG c-wave responses were also decreased in the presence of NaIO
3 and CIA + NaIO
3 compared to control and CIA mice (
Fig. 4C;
P ≤ 0.0001). However, due to the greatly diminished c-wave response caused by NaIO
3, differences between NaIO
3 and CIA + NaIO
3 were indiscernible. These results were also true for c-wave comparisons made between sexes. However, as previously reported, c-wave responses in male mice were significantly lower than in female mice.
50 ZO-1 staining in the peripheral area of RPE/choroid flatmounts demonstrated a loss of normal RPE hexagonal shape documented in control and CIA mice (
Fig. 2C) in the presence of NaIO
3 (
Fig. 4D), indicative of a very unhealthy RPE, and damage that appeared to be further increased in the presence of CIA. Quantification of cell area (
Fig. 4E) and form factor (
Fig. 4F) was used to confirm these observations. Here we observed no significant difference between RPE cell area and form factor (a measurement of circularity) between control and CIA mice. Significant increases in cell area were observed in NaIO
3-treated mice compared to control (
P ≤ 0.001) and CIA (
P ≤ 0.05) mice (
Fig. 4E). This increase in size was further augmented in CIA + NaIO
3 mice compared to control (
P ≤ 0.0001) and CIA (
P ≤ 0.0001). Importantly, CIA + NaIO
3 demonstrated an added increase in cell area compared to NaIO
3 alone (
P ≤ 0.05). Likewise, NaIO
3-treated and CIA + NaIO
3–treated mice both exhibited a decrease in RPE form factor compared to control (
P ≤ 0.0001) and CIA (
P ≤ 0.0001;
Fig. 4F) mice, and an even greater decrease in form factor was found in CIA + NaIO
3 mice compared to NaIO
3 alone (
P ≤ 0.0001). These results indicate that NaIO
3 treatment leads to an increase in elongated cell size and loss of the normal hexagonal shape observed in healthy RPE cells, both of which are further increased in the presence of CIA. No significant differences were observed between sex (data not shown).