June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Variation of human cone spectral composition with eccentricity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Sierra Schleufer
    Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Hongyi Yan
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Xiaoyun Jiang
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • James Kuchenbecker
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Maureen Neitz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Jay Neitz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Ramkumar Sabesan
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan, University of Washington, Seattle (P); Sierra Schleufer, None; Hongyi Yan, None; Xiaoyun Jiang, None; James Kuchenbecker, None; Maureen Neitz, None; Jay Neitz, None; Ramkumar Sabesan, University of Washington, Seattle (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH U01EY025501, R21EY027941, R01EY029710, R01EY028118, P30EY001730 Unrestricted grant from the Research to Prevent Blindness, Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award, Burroughs Wellcome Fund Careers at the Scientific Interfaces, Murdock Charitable Trust
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 51. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan, Sierra Schleufer, Hongyi Yan, Xiaoyun Jiang, James Kuchenbecker, Maureen Neitz, Jay Neitz, Ramkumar Sabesan; Variation of human cone spectral composition with eccentricity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):51.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The cone mosaic sets the primary limit on the fidelity of luminance and color vision. Here we describe the spectral composition of the cone mosaic in the parafovea using an adaptive optics (AO) line-scan OCT-based optoretinogram (ORG) and compare the modality against AO retinal densitometry and flicker-photometric electroretinogram (ERG).

Methods : Two subjects were imaged in an AO line-scan OCT from at 1.5 to 10 deg temporal eccentricity (ecc.) after 3-4 min. of dark adaptation. OCT volumes were recorded after a 10-20 ms 660±10 nm LED flash. The B-scan rate was 6 to 12 kHz and field of view was 1 to 1.6 deg. The stimulus-induced optical phase change was computed between individual cone inner/outer segment junctions and outer segment tips in registered and segmented volumes and converted to optical path length (OPL). The change in OPL was subjected to Gaussian mixture model clustering to distinguish the three cone types. In one subject, cone spectral identities so obtained with ORG were compared against AO retinal densitometry at 1.5 deg ecc. and the nature of disagreements explored. ERG was conducted on both subjects with a 35 deg stimulus for comparison against ORG.

Results : Depending on cone type, bleach strength and ecc., OPL amplitudes vary from 10 - 700 nm, thus offering up to ~2 log units of sensitivity for separating cone types in ORG. Thus, high probability and low uncertainty in LMS assignments were obtained for both subjects across a large population of cones at each ecc. The cone types obtained from ORG and densitometry had ~90.5 % agreement, tested over 813 cones at 1.5 deg ecc. Disagreement of spectral-type assignments included incidence of cones with normal reflectivity in one system but not the other, typed as “dysflective". Of the disagreements, ~44% of mismatches were between L vs. M, ~5% were between LM vs. S, and ~51% involve instances of dysflectivity. For subject 1, the L:M ratio was 2.2, 3.0, 3.0 and 2.4 at 1.5, 3.5, 4.75, and 10 deg ecc., respectively. For subject 2, the L:M ratio was 2.2, 2.0, 2.1 at 1.5, 4.75 and 10 deg ecc. For both subjects, % S-cones increased with ecc., from 4 – 7.6%. The L:M ratios derived from ERG were 2.2 and 2.7 respectively.

Conclusions : Cone spectral composition based on ORG aligned well with densitometry and ERG. The L:M cone ratio remained relatively uniform in the parafovea.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×