June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Are we doing better? Impact of treatment paradigm change on neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment outcomes over the past decade. A big data analysis.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Roy Schwartz
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Health Informatics, London, United Kingdom
  • Alasdair Warwick
    University College London Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Abraham Olvera-Barrios
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Maria Pikoula
    University College London Institute of Health Informatics, London, United Kingdom
    Health Data Research UK, London, United Kingdom
  • Aaron Y Lee
    University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Spiros Denaxas
    University College London Institute of Health Informatics, London, United Kingdom
    Health Data Research UK, London, United Kingdom
  • Paul Taylor
    University College London Institute of Health Informatics, London, United Kingdom
  • Catherine Egan
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Usha Chakravarthy
    Queen's University Belfast Centre for Public Health, Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
  • Peck Lin Lip
    Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Adnan Tufail
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Roy Schwartz, None; Alasdair Warwick, None; Abraham Olvera-Barrios, None; Maria Pikoula, None; Aaron Lee, None; Spiros Denaxas, None; Paul Taylor, None; Catherine Egan, None; Usha Chakravarthy, None; Peck Lin Lip, None; Adnan Tufail, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  The authors acknowledge a proportion of our financial support from the UK Department of Health through an award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology.. Data collection was funded by a Grant from Novartis Pharmaceutical. Novartis has no input into the analysis, interpretation or content of this manuscript
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 344. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Roy Schwartz, Alasdair Warwick, Abraham Olvera-Barrios, Maria Pikoula, Aaron Y Lee, Spiros Denaxas, Paul Taylor, Catherine Egan, Usha Chakravarthy, Peck Lin Lip, Adnan Tufail; Are we doing better? Impact of treatment paradigm change on neovascular age-related macular degeneration treatment outcomes over the past decade. A big data analysis.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):344.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has evolved over the last decade with several treatment regimens and different medications. This study describes the treatment patterns and visual outcomes over ten years in a large cohort of patients.

Methods : This was a retrospective analysis of electronic health records from 27 National Health Service (NHS) secondary care healthcare providers in the UK. Treatment-naïve patients receiving at least three intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections for nAMD in their first six months of follow-up were included in the study. Patients with missing data for age or gender and those aged less than 55 were excluded. Eyes with at least three years of follow-up were grouped by years of treatment initiation, and three-year outcomes were compared between the groups. Data were generated during routine clinical care between 09/2008 and 12/2018. Main outcome measures included visual acuity (VA), number of injections, and number of visits.

Results : A total of 15,843 eyes of 13,734 patients receiving 195,238 injections were included. VA improved from baseline during the first year, but dropped thereafter, resulting in loss of visual gains. This trend remained consistent throughout the past decade. Although an increasing proportion of eyes remained in the driving standard, this was driven by better presenting visual acuities over the decade. The number of injections dropped substantially between the first and subsequent years, from a mean of 6.25 in year 1 to 3 in year 2 and 2.5 in year 3, without improvement over the decade. In a multivariable regression analysis, final VA improved by 0.24 letters for each year since 2008, and younger age and baseline VA were significantly associated with VA at three years.

Conclusions : Our findings show that despite improvement in functional VA over the years, primarily driven by improving baseline VA, patients continue to lose vision after the first year of treatment, with only marginal change over the past decade. The data suggest that these results may be related to suboptimal treatment patterns, which have not improved over the years. Rethinking treatment strategies may be warranted, possibly on a national level or through the introduction of longer-acting therapies.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×