June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Per-region visual field sensitivities and delays in AMD
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Bhim Bahadur Rai
    Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Rohan W Essex
    Ophthamology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Faran Sabeti
    Optometry, University of Canberra Faculty of Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
    Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Ted Maddess
    Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Emilie Rohan
    Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Josh P van Kleef
    Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Corinne Carle
    Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Bhim Rai, None; Rohan Essex, None; Faran Sabeti, Konan Medical USA (F); Ted Maddess, Konan Medical USA (F), Konan Medical USA (P); Emilie Rohan, None; Josh van Kleef, Konan Medical USA (F), Konan Medical USA (P), Konan Medical USA (R); Corinne Carle, Konan Medical USA (F), Konan Medical USA (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC Grant APP1063458
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 317. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bhim Bahadur Rai, Rohan W Essex, Faran Sabeti, Ted Maddess, Emilie Rohan, Josh P van Kleef, Corinne Carle; Per-region visual field sensitivities and delays in AMD. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):317.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare central vs. peripheral visual field sensitivities and delays in neovascular AMD (nAMD) and earlier-stage fellow eyes using FDA-cleared multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP).

Methods : We recruited 18 nAMD patients testing both eyes concurrently. Practitioner directed intravitreal anti-VEGF injection was administered monthly for 14 to 28 visits. Diagnostic procedures included mfPOP, Matrix 10-2 perimetry, and OCT. The macular mfPOP variant had 44 interleaved stimuli/eye presented from fixation to 15o eccentricity. We examined correlations between central and peripheral mfPOP per-region sensitivities and delays within eyes, and between nAMD eyes and untreated fellow eyes.

Results : Twenty-three eyes of 18 patients were tested (14 females, 77.8%). In treated eyes central sensitivity decreased over time by -2.23 ± 0.051 dB/month (p<0.0002). Untreated fellow central sensitivity declined at -0.17 ± 0.07 dB/month (p=0.033). Treated eyes showed quicker central responses by 13.08 ± 3.77 ms than untreated eyes (p=0.001). Based on peripheral sensitivities and delays we have identified two patient categories: positive types with hypersensitivity and longer delays, and negative types with hyposensitivity and shorter delays compared to normal controls. When analysed separately mfPOP data showed an ability to predict the need for anti-VEGF injection. Among the positive eyes peripheral sensitivity increased by 9.88 ± 4.41 dB (p=0.042) before treatment, and delays increased by 3.49 ± 1.75 ms/month (p=0.049). For the negative eyes, the peripheral sensitivity dropped, and the delay was shorter a month before the treatment by 9.38 ± 3.59 (p=0.013), and a month following treatment it improved towards normal values (shorter by 8.50 ± 2.71 ms, p=0.004).

Conclusions : We observed decreased central sensitivity, and coincident peripheral hypersensitivity. In the untreated fellow eyes, the central sensitivity decreased and delay increased progressively until treatment was needed. Based on peripheral responses the eyes could be divided into positive and negative groups. The predictive value of mfPOP improved after the positive and negative eyes were analysed separately. Diagnostic sensitivity and delay changes could precede active disease by 1 to 3 months. We conclude that mfPOP may be a potential biomarker to predict the need for anti-VEGF injections in nAMD.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×