June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of School-Based Visual Screening for Kindergarten Children
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mayu Nishimura
    Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Daphne Maurer
    Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Agnes M.F. Wong
    Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Mayu Nishimura, None; Daphne Maurer, None; Agnes Wong, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  PSI Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 155. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mayu Nishimura, Daphne Maurer, Agnes M.F. Wong; Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of School-Based Visual Screening for Kindergarten Children. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):155.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Some 10% of kindergarten children have undetected refractive errors and 3-5% need treatment to prevent amblyopia. In many jurisdictions, no universal screening program exists to detect these problems. We hypothesized that offering visual screening to children in senior kindergarten (i.e., age 5) would lower the later prevalence of amblyopia and other visual problems.

Methods : 50 high-needs schools in Toronto, Canada were randomly assigned to screening or no screening (i.e., status quo). Children in senior kindergarten (n = 1468) at 25 schools were screened using 3 tests (visual acuity, stereoacuity, photoscreener). 747 children (50.9%) passed screening, 551 children (37.5%) failed screening, 163 children (11.1%) were absent for screening, and 7 children (0.05%) opted out. Children who failed screening or were absent were offered a comprehensive eye exam (with cycloplegia) at school with an optometrist and it was attended by 408 (74%) and 49 (30%), respectively. If glasses were needed, they were dispensed at no cost (n = 225). When the children were in Grade 2 (~1.5 years after screening), visual acuity, stereoacuity, and uncyclopleged refractive errors (with photoscreener) were assessed in all 50 schools (n = 2715 children).

Results : The prevalence of amblyopia in Grade 2 did not differ between screened schools (8.6%) and non-screened schools (7.5%), p = .10. There was also no difference in the prevalence of visual problems other than amblyopia (45.1% versus 47.1%, p = .51). However, in screened schools more children were wearing glasses (5.0% versus 3.5%, p = .05), and more children reported that they had lost or broken their glasses (8.3% versus 4.7%, p = .01).

Conclusions : Visual screening is effective in identifying children with previously undiagnosed visual problems. However, the benefits may not translate to better visual outcomes 1.5 years later because of other factors (e.g., delays in seeing an optometrist, no support for buying or replacing glasses, parents' (and teachers') lack of understanding about the importance of treatment, lack of treatment compliance). In addition to visual screening, strategies to mitigate these factors are necessary to improve children’s visual health.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×