June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Studying Visual Disability in a Nationally-Representative Panel Study of Older Adults
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ajay Kolli
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Lindsey De Lott
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Mengyao Hu
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Yunshu Zhou
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Joshua R Ehrlich
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ajay Kolli, None; Lindsey De Lott, None; Mengyao Hu, None; Yunshu Zhou, None; Joshua Ehrlich, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  JRE is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (K23EY027848).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3584. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ajay Kolli, Lindsey De Lott, Mengyao Hu, Yunshu Zhou, Joshua R Ehrlich; Studying Visual Disability in a Nationally-Representative Panel Study of Older Adults. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3584.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Self-reported visual disability (SRVD) is an important indicator of the perceived impact of vision on an individual’s life. The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) is an ongoing, nationally-representative panel study of late-life disability. Using survey items with binary response options, we sought to develop an ordinal indicator of SRVD in NHATS in order to improve measurement precision and facilitate future studies of disability trajectories related to vision in older adults.

Methods : Sociodemographic factors, medical comorbidities, SRVD, functional activity scores (mobility, self-care, household activity), and a subjective well-being scale were assessed in NHATS. Participants were asked questions (yes/no) to assess vision: blindness; sight adequate to recognize someone across the street; sight adequate to read newspaper print; use of glasses or corrective lenses; and use of any low vision aid (LVA). We categorized participants into one of six ordinal groups: 1) Blind; 2) Near and distance SRVD without use of LVA; 3) Near and distance SRVD with LVA; 4) Near or distance SRVD without LVA; 5) Near or distance SRVD with LVA; or 6) No SRVD. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to assess convergent validity of the SRVD scale with functional activity (household, self-care, mobility) and subjective wellbeing scores.

Results : 7061 Individuals, age 65 years or older were included in this analysis. Weighted percentages of individuals in each of the six ordinal SRVD categories, and weighted mean functional activity and wellbeing scores by vision category are shown in Table 1. In models adjusted for sociodemographic and medical comorbidities, worse SRVD was significantly associated with lower scores for mobility (p<0.0001), self-care (p<0.0001), household activity (p<0.0001), and subjective wellbeing (p<0.0001) (Figure 1).

Conclusions : More severe SRVD on this novel scale was associated with worse scores for mobility, self-care, household activities, and subjective wellbeing among aging adults. This scale provides a new tool to capture the range of impacts that poor vision may have on the lives of older adults in a nationally-representative cohort. Use of this scale may facilitate analyses of the impact of SRVD on late-life disability trajectories.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×