June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Treatment Outcomes in the Susanna Glaucoma Drainage Device after 1 Year of Follow-up
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Fernanda Susanna
    Universidade de Sao Paulo Faculdade de Medicina, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Bianca Susanna
    Ophthalmology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil
  • Carolina Nicolela Susanna
    Ophthalmology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre, SP, Brazil
  • Marcelo Nicolela
    Ophthalmology, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Remo Susanna
    Universidade de Sao Paulo Faculdade de Medicina, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Fernanda Susanna, None; Bianca Susanna, None; Carolina Susanna, None; Marcelo Nicolela, None; Remo Susanna, Adapt (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3403. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Fernanda Susanna, Bianca Susanna, Carolina Nicolela Susanna, Marcelo Nicolela, Remo Susanna; Treatment Outcomes in the Susanna Glaucoma Drainage Device after 1 Year of Follow-up. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3403.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To determine the efficacy and complications of the Susanna glaucoma drainage device (SGDD) implant in refractory glaucoma.

Methods : Retrospective study. Medical records from consecutive glaucoma patients followed in a private clinical practice were included in the study. All patients that had undergone SGGD implant surgery from the period of September 2016 to July 2019 were included. All surgeries were done by the same surgeon (RSJ). Primary outcome was surgical failure, defined as IOP>18 mmHg and/or less than 20% IOP reduction from baseline, IOP less than 5 mmHg, reoperation for glaucoma need of implant removal or loss of light perception vision. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP, use of supplemental medical therapy, and complications.

Results : 22 eyes were analyzed. Mean patient age was 63 ± 15 (range: 27 to 87) years. Mean IOP decreased from 23 ± 7 mmHg to 11 ± 8 mmHg (P<0.001, paired t-test) at an average of 18 ± 9 months after the tube implant. The mean SD number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 3.3 ± 1 to 1.5 ± 1.2 at the last postoperative visit (P<0.01, paired t-test). No early postoperative complications occurred. There was one case of persistent hypotony that was solved with tube ligature. Failure due to high IOP occurred in two cases. There was no extrusion or erosion of the tube or the plate.

Conclusions : The SGDD presented a 13.6% failure rate with very few complications, being an efficient and safe alternative for refractory glaucoma.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure1. Susanna Glaucoma Drainage Device

Figure1. Susanna Glaucoma Drainage Device

 

TABLE 1. Baseline and Postoperative Data of Study Patients

TABLE 1. Baseline and Postoperative Data of Study Patients

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×