June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Functional vision in the real-world environment with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lewis Karapanos
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Carla J Abbott
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Lauren N Ayton
    Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Maria Kolic
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Myra McGuinness
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    The University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Elizabeth K Baglin
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Samuel A Titchener
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Jessica Kvansakul
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Dean Johnson
    Specialised Orientation and Mobility, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • William G Kentler
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Nick Barnes
    Research School of Engineering, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • David A X Nayagam
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Matthew A Petoe
    Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Penelope J Allen
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lewis Karapanos, None; Carla Abbott, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Bionic Vision Technologies (R); Lauren Ayton, None; Maria Kolic, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Bionic Vision Technologies (R); Myra McGuinness, None; Elizabeth Baglin, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Bionic Vision Technologies (R); Samuel Titchener, Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Jessica Kvansakul, None; Dean Johnson, None; William Kentler, None; Nick Barnes, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Data61 (P); David Nayagam, Bionics Institute (P), Bionic Vision Technologies (F); Matthew Petoe, Bionics Institute (P), Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Bionic Vision Technologies (R); Penelope Allen, Bionic Vision Technologies (F), Centre for Eye Research Australia (P)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NHMRC grant #1082358
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 3203. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lewis Karapanos, Carla J Abbott, Lauren N Ayton, Maria Kolic, Myra McGuinness, Elizabeth K Baglin, Samuel A Titchener, Jessica Kvansakul, Dean Johnson, William G Kentler, Nick Barnes, David A X Nayagam, Matthew A Petoe, Penelope J Allen; Functional vision in the real-world environment with a 44-channel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):3203.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The Bionic Vision Technologies Australia suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (“bionic eye”) has been shown to improve functional vision in patients with late stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) in a first-generation trial in a laboratory setting. In a subsequent trial of a second-generation device (NCT03406416), we assessed whether patients with late stage RP could increase their performance in real-world functional visual tasks conducted with the prosthesis switched ON compared to OFF.

Methods : The Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA) instrument was administered to three males (aged 39, 47 and 63) and one female (aged 66) before implantation and at 17, 20, 32, 44, 56 and 68 weeks after device fitting. The FLORA contains 13 self-reported and 35 observer-reported items. The ease of which participants completed each functional vision task was assessed with a four-point scale: impossible, difficult, moderate, and easy. The tasks were evaluated in four discrete domains: ‘Visual Orientation’, ‘Visual Mobility’, ‘Daily Life’ and ‘Interaction with Others’. The distribution of person-level domain scores has been summarised via mode.

Results : Three participants completed the FLORA up to 68 weeks, with one participant being lost to follow up at 20 weeks for reasons unrelated to the device. For all participants after 17 weeks, the mode ease of task score with the device switched ON was higher or equal to when it was switched OFF (Figure 1). In general, ease of task score increased over time with the device switched ON. Tasks from the ‘Visual Orientation’ and ‘Daily Life’ domains were the main contributors to this effect. Qualitative analyses revealed participant-reported improvements in mobility, functional vision, and quality of life with device switched ON.

Conclusions : Participants with late-stage RP implanted with the second-generation suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis demonstrated improved ease of task scores over time with device ON relative to OFF. Improvement of ease of task scores over time with the device ON suggests a learning effect. The device shows potential utility in everyday life, and further research into its real-world use is warranted.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Figure 1. Mode Ease of Task Scores for each participant with the Device Switched ON and OFF over 68 weeks (Participants A – D) Post-Device Fitting. Participant D assessed until 20 weeks. *If bi-modal, higher mode presented.

Figure 1. Mode Ease of Task Scores for each participant with the Device Switched ON and OFF over 68 weeks (Participants A – D) Post-Device Fitting. Participant D assessed until 20 weeks. *If bi-modal, higher mode presented.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×