June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Automated Machine Learning vs. Inception for the Autonomous Detection of Disc Hemorrhage
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Aaron C Brown
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Henry Cousins
    Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
  • Clara Cousins
    Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Nisha Chadha
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Kateki Vinod
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Alon Harris
    Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Fotis Topouzis
    Laboratory of Research and Clinical Applications in Ophthalmology, Aristoteleio Panepistemio Thessalonikes Tmema Iatrikes, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
  • Vassilis Kilintzis
    Laboratory of Research and Clinical Applications in Ophthalmology, Aristoteleio Panepistemio Thessalonikes Tmema Iatrikes, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
  • Michael Coote
    Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Louis R Pasquale
    Department of Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Aaron Brown, None; Henry Cousins, None; Clara Cousins, None; Nisha Chadha, None; Kateki Vinod, None; Alon Harris, Adom (S), AdOM (C), AdOM (I), Luseed (C), Luseed (I), Oxymap (I), Phileas Pharma (S), Phileas Pharma (I), Qlaris (C), Qlaris (S), Qlaris (I), QuLent (I); Fotis Topouzis, None; Vassilis Kilintzis, None; Michael Coote, None; Louis Pasquale, Emerald Bioscience (C), Eyenovia (C), Nicox (C), Twenty-twenty (C)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI EY015473, NIH grant (R01EY030851) and NSF-DMS (1853222/2021192)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 2133. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Aaron C Brown, Henry Cousins, Clara Cousins, Nisha Chadha, Kateki Vinod, Alon Harris, Fotis Topouzis, Vassilis Kilintzis, Michael Coote, Louis R Pasquale; Automated Machine Learning vs. Inception for the Autonomous Detection of Disc Hemorrhage. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):2133.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare automated machine learning (AutoML) to transfer learning (Inception) for disc hemorrhage (DH) identification.

Methods : This study was a retrospective analysis of fundus photographs obtained from the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mt. Sinai, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Thessaloniki Eye Study, and GONE datasets. High magnification fundus photographs of different resolutions and sources centered on the optic disc were included. Ground truth was established by the consensus of grades from two masked glaucoma specialists. Images were graded independently and disagreements in grading were resolved via adjudication, ungradable images were excluded. The complete dataset was split into training (80%), validation (10%), and test (10%). An automated machine learning model (AutoML), which tunes model hyperparameters without user engagement, was trained to distinguish disc hemorrhage (DH) positive and DH negative images. After training and validation, AutoML evaluated the model against a subset of test images, providing Precision and Recall data for each confidence threshold from 0 to 1. This process yields a binary classification model that predicts DH based on the returned probability at a given confidence threshold. A hard-coded convolutional neural network model based on the widely used InceptionV3 architecture was trained on the same data set. The performance of each model on an identical test set was then evaluated.

Results : A total of 897 images were included, 314 DH positive and 583 DH negative. The AutoML model achieved an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.923, a sensitivity of 85% and specificity and 86%. For the hard-coded deep learning model, AUPRC was 0.82 with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 60%, respectively. The Inception model attention maps help visualize what parts of an image contributed most to a prediction (Fig 1).

Conclusions : The AutoML algorithm performance was high and showed good concordance with a traditional hard-coded algorithm. AutoML offers a low clearance method for clinicians without programming expertise to develop and deploy deep learning solutions.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Fig 1. Attention maps demonstrate the pixels of disc images that contributed most to a prediction. Applying the disc photo's attention map reveals that the most important areas for this prediction are the inferotemporal disc hemorrhage and peripapillary areas.

Fig 1. Attention maps demonstrate the pixels of disc images that contributed most to a prediction. Applying the disc photo's attention map reveals that the most important areas for this prediction are the inferotemporal disc hemorrhage and peripapillary areas.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×