Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 62, Issue 8
June 2021
Volume 62, Issue 8
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2021
Patient satisfaction with ophthalmic telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nedda Sanayei
    Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Melanie Albrecht
    Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Andrew Baker
    Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Frank Vavrek
    Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Marissa Gabrielle Fiorello
    Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Manishi Desai
    Ophthalmology, Glaucoma Service, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Nicole Siegel
    Ophthalmology, Retina Service, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Manju L Subramanian
    Ophthalmology, Retina Service, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Steven Ness
    Ophthalmology, Retina Service, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Xuejing Chen
    Ophthalmology, Retina Service, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nedda Sanayei, None; Melanie Albrecht, None; Andrew Baker, None; Frank Vavrek, None; Marissa Fiorello, None; Manishi Desai, None; Nicole Siegel, None; Manju Subramanian, None; Steven Ness, None; Xuejing Chen, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2021, Vol.62, 1733. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nedda Sanayei, Melanie Albrecht, Andrew Baker, Frank Vavrek, Marissa Gabrielle Fiorello, Manishi Desai, Nicole Siegel, Manju L Subramanian, Steven Ness, Xuejing Chen; Patient satisfaction with ophthalmic telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62(8):1733.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare patient satisfaction for telemedicine visits to traditional in-person clinical visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Ophthalmology Department at Boston Medical Center (BMC), the largest academic safety-net hospital in New England.

Methods : Patient satisfaction surveys using the NRC Health platform were sent to all patients in their preferred language following eye clinic visits at BMC from June to October 2020. Three visit types were studied: 1) virtual visits via telephone or video conferencing, 2) hybrid visits with protocol-driven set of undilated imaging (e.g. OCT, fundus photos, visual fields), visual acuity, and intraocular pressure obtained by a trained technician, followed by a virtual visit with the physician within 1-2 weeks, and 3) traditional in-person visits. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare survey responses of telemedicine to traditional visits in 4 questions: 1) trust in provider (4-point scale, “trust”), 2) felt provider listened (4-point scale, “listened”), 3) satisfied with amount of time spent with provider (4-point scale, “time”), and 4) recommend provider to other patients (10-point scale, “recommend”). Additionally, responses between English and non-English speakers, requiring trained interpreter services, were compared.

Results : A total of 793 visits were included (44 virtual, 56 hybrid, 693 traditional). The majority of telemedicine visits were from the retina and optometry services (Figure 1). There was no statistically significant difference in “trust”, “listened”, “time”, or “recommend” when comparing virtual or hybrid visits to traditional visits (Table 1a). Non-English speakers had statistically significant lower scores in “trust”, “listened”, and “time” with no difference in “recommend” when compared to English speakers (Table 1b). When stratified by visit type, non-English speakers had a trend towards a lower score in “trust” for both virtual and hybrid groups.

Conclusions : Telemedicine provides patients access to clinical care with decreased risk of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Non-English speakers tended to have less trust in the physician for all visit types, which should be considered when communicating with patients. Overall, we found that patients were equally satisfied with telemedicine visits as with traditional in-person visits in a hospital-based academic eye clinic.

This is a 2021 ARVO Annual Meeting abstract.

 

Distribution of eye clinic services utilizing telemedicine

Distribution of eye clinic services utilizing telemedicine

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×